• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      this is either the perfect comment that uses the word “ignoramus”, or the worst insult.

      I’m still not sure if you actually meant to do it or not.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          We’re not speaking bloody Latin ya ignoramus.

          ignoramous: 1570s, originally an Anglo-French legal term (early 15c.), from Latin ignoramus “we take no notice of, we do not know,” first person plural present indicative of ignorare “not to know, take no notice of” (see ignorant).

          your comment used it as a zeugma. the term described who you were speaking to as “one who is ignorant” as well as being used as a tongue-in-cheek soliloquy, using a Latin term when you had announced none were present, which used the original definition of “we take no notice of, we do not know”.

          it’s quite clever, though I doubt you meant to do it 😆.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Good, so you would understand that today the R word in 99% of any realistic context is going to be a slur. Stop trying to “um akshually” defend the usage of it.

            • ranzispa@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              17 hours ago

              One thing I don’t like about this approach, which I have seen mostly coming from the US but also in other places, is that with the best intentions people identify a problem. Once the problem is identified some plausible solutions are discussed. A bit of attention is placed into how to act in everyday life to limit such an issue. An often proposed option, mostly in the US - I have not seen this in other places, is to stop using words that may have an influence in aggravating or normalising such a problem. All this is good thinking and a great way to address the problem, but eventually many people forget what the actual objective of such action was and end up discussing about the usage of words rather than the actual problem.

              I’m pretty sure the person above did not mean to insult people with medical conditions in any way. Is the whole of this discussion actually important in any way? Are you actually helping people with mental diseases by pointing this out?

              • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I’m pretty sure the person above did not mean to insult people with medical conditions in any way.

                I’m sure they didn’t. However, they’re using a term that is very offensive to some people, which they may be unaware of. That’s why it was pointed out. If they want to be an asshole and continue using it anyway, that’s on them.

                • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  I’m offended by being considered “some people”. I’m not “people” I’m a person.

                  in recent history, I was always grouped into social hierarchies as “you people”.

                  it’s very offensive, you should stop calling us “people” and start using the word “person” or “persons”.