I know that security is a bit of a show and its really more of a deterant, but I was wondering realistically how I could prevent someone breaking and entering a small-ish American home? What is actually effective?
I know that security is a bit of a show and its really more of a deterant, but I was wondering realistically how I could prevent someone breaking and entering a small-ish American home? What is actually effective?
Owning a gun. Don’t shoot to kill, shoot to send a message. If the thief knows you’re not fucking around, they won’t try that shit again unless they’re dumb enough to think you’ve trashed the gun by not needing it.
And only shoot to defend yourself, target non-vital areas if you’re able, shoot for graze shots. But don’t shoot to kill if it can be helped.
This is moronic advice coming from someone who has never even held a gun, much less seen a situation where one is a life-saving tool. Firearms don’t work like they do in the movies.
If you want to use one for self-defense, seek professional training, learn the local laws, and also make sure you have insurance. Even lawful uses of firearms get brought into court. This can be financially disastrous if you aren’t prepared for it.
If you choose to deploy a firearm for personal defense, you shoot high-center-mass and you shoot until the target stops doing whatever it was that warranted them being shot. In areas that have a duty to retreat, you must comply with those and other requirements before, during, and after you deploy your firearm.
Don’t listen to internet knuckleheads about firearms. It’ll get you killed or imprisoned for a very long time.
Okay, so your method is to become a cold killer. What a moron you are. You’re the reason gun issues are a problem.
Thank you for continuing to demonstrate you know absolutely nothing about the subject, but yet you appear to think we should care about your uneducated, ignorant opinion.
Talk to me when you know what “AOJ” means.
This is bad advice and will possibly leave you in more legal trouble then if you killed a home invader. Most places in the US, you aren’t justified to shoot at someone unless you reasonably fear for your life. Shooting to wound or maim has been used successfully in the past to “prove” you weren’t fearing for your life, turning an otherwise “justified” shooting into an "unjustified"one.
This is not advocation to shoot people. It is always a better option to get away to safety or prevent the intrusion via security methods like bars on windows and heavy, locked doors.
IANAL.
Did you skip over the part where I said “only shoot to defend yourself”?
You did, didn’t you. Not my fault.
That’s all well and good but the prosecution in your case, and there will be a case, is definitely going to use the fact that you were shooting irresponsibly against you.
First of all as has been previously noted by another user, it has been used successfully to “prove” that the defendant didn’t fear for their life and as a result people who were just defending themselves have wound up in prison for a long time.
Second, “aim for grazing shots” is dangerous, and is more likely to injure a bystander than putting an appropriate hollow point bullet into the thickest part of an attacker, center mass, where the bullet is more likely to be contained rather than exit (and if it exits, it will have dumped most of the kenetic energy into the target and broken up a bit, thus still safer.) Literally all training classes teach you to aim for center mass because of this, and the fact that you’re more likely to actually hit than miss entirely, which is pretty important. Like Mel Gibson says in The Patriot when he and his kids ambush the british, “Aim small, miss small.” It’s a movie, but it’s no less true, “chest bigger than head, hit to chest better than missing head.” (In this case, “head” would be “graze,” but that advice is so untethered from reality I’m not used to it, most people you have to tell this to are aiming for heads or feet, which it also applies to, so I’m used to instructing them rather than grazers.)
I suggest you take a bare minimum defensive pistol/rifle class before giving advice designed to get people killed or imprisoned, they can be very informative.
For anyone else reading his advice: PLEASE do not listen to that, look up the laws in your specific area and take basic safety and basic defensive courses, and practice until you have muscle memory.
Bad advice is bad, mmmkay.