• Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It really isn’t, The President in Idiocracy cared about his people and listened to the smartest man in the world.

  • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Really? When was tge last time our leaders were like “We have a problem, let’s listen to what the actually smart people have to say and act on that”?

    • Rusty@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      In the 80s scientists discovered that ozone layer has a growing hole caused by CFCs. All UN members signed the Montreal protocol designed to protect the ozone layer. It has been healing all this time and right now the problem is pretty much solved.

      Another good example is year 2000 problem. Computer scientists outlined the problem, got the financing for that and solved it with almost zero issues.

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Hah, the smart people would be laughed outta the room as nerds! Unless of course they had an idea, in which case it was actually always the rich peoples ideas, and the poor inventors were simply assistants.

        Recently watched a video on the beginnings of the internet and boy is Samuel Morse and all those old timey fucks just as bad as today.

        • Zexks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          And gave him 3 days to figure it out after sending him to prison. And if it wasnt for a fight after a hand job he would have died and nothing would have changed.

        • Johanno@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes because nobody was smart enough to horde all power and money and deny anybody else from changing things.

          Yes probably in a thousands years we still have rich assholes who control everything. But they hadn’t in idiocracy

          • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes because nobody was smart enough to horde all power and money and deny anybody else from changing things.

            We don’t know enough of the world of Idiocracy to draw such conclusions. We don’t know who owns that giant store, the TV stations or the appartment buildings.

  • RedFrank24@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I want to enjoy Idiocracy, but there’s this undercurrent of eugenics in there that I’m not ever so fond of…

    • barooboodoo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s the comedic premise of the movie, it’s not like it perpetuates the racist notions that were the real problem with pseudoscience like eugenics.

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The whole movie relies exclusively on the idea that eugenics is real, even though they’re not focused on a racist subset of it.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It does though

        It would’ve been a lot better if it just left the eugenics part out. They could’ve just had the main character wake up in the future instead of having the long narrative.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a completely absurdist theme. The people insisting it reflects reality in any way are the ones that bother me.

      Still, it’s a simple movie with simple jokes. The kind of thing maybe worth watching once, and not worth thinking about.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It only bothers me when people are hung up on the genetics aspect.

        People (broadly statistically) tend to grow up to be similar to thier parents in terms of values. Not so much because of DNA, but because of how they were raised.

        The premise holds even if you toss away anything to do with biology. (Which you should)

        Idiots tend to have idiot kids because they raised them in idiot households, and idiots tend to have more kids.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Idiots tend to have idiot kids because they raised them in idiot households

          Random people are usually way smarter than people give them credit. Idiots are an exception, though I have no idea how hey are distributed.

          and idiots tend to have more kids

          That’s completely unfundamented idea that was created to support some racist movements. One would think that movie made a clear enough point to convince anybody this is bullshit…

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m maybe being unfair to say idiots are having more kids.

            It is a growing case where people who score relatively higher in awareness of world events to choose not to have kids at all. Between the environment and, well, gestures broadly that group of people is choosing to not have kids.

            Calling people idiots or not, that’s overly broad. I understand that. There are material negative pressures felt by people who value understanding the state of the world, that are not felt by those who don’t.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Higher awareness of world events is not a genetic trait

              That’s where eugenics falls apart. It oversimplifies genetics and people and leads to genocide.

              • Windex007@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                This is exactly why I explicitly said you should reject the explanation of genetics, even if learned behaviors have a tendency to be passed from primary caregivers to children.

            • marcos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yes, we have an anti-birth set of memes going around.

              But people sharing your memes doesn’t mean they are smarter.

              • Windex007@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I don’t subscribe to the doomerism mentality and I think it’s counter productive precisely because of the argument laid out in Idiocracy

                But people sharing your memes doesn’t mean they are smarter.

                I went to great lengths in my previous point to say exactly that. Was that still unclear?

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    In Idiocracy, everybody is dumb. This is unrealistic, as in the past, now, and in the future, there have been, are and will be plenty of intensely intelligent people screaming the answers in our face, all while we keep fucking it up.

    • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I feel like it can be broken down to roughly 30% of people are stupid shitty dumbasses (regardless of demographic, that percentage applies to everything, all the time, in every context. At least 30% of everything sucks, as a rule.), 40% of people are intelligent enough but are generally apathetic to other people and politics in general, and 30% of people are the change needed and sometimes that is enough people.

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      You act like intelligence is some kind of evolutionary goal that cant be lost once obtained. Not a safe bet

  • Honytawk@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    In Idiocracy, people are anti-science. If you were to read a book, they would call you a nerd and kill you.

    In real life, people believe in pseudo-science. Everyone read books, and believes that to be the ultimate truth and everybody else is wrong.

    In Idiocracy, you don’t have flat-earthers, anti-vaxxers, climate change deniers. You have dumb people proud of not knowing stuff.

    So there is still a difference.

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      You are vastly over estimating literacy rates. And you cant really make that statement on any grounds as nothing of the like was discussed.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Everyone reads books? Over half of Americans read at a 6th-grade level, at best.

  • halvar@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Alright so first of all let’s get this out of the way parody ≠ documentary.

    Second of all it doesn’t parody how stupid people will have more sex and stupid genetics will spread too much, that’s just a throwaway joke at the begining of the movie. What really leads there is smart people working on stupid things to please the masses of stupid people and not doing anything to stop stupid people from, well acting stupid. Which is what causes societies to delcine in general. Stupid people don’t produce stupid offspring in general, but a society where smart people are too short-sighted to care about the decline of their society will inevitably lead to stupid people taking over for good.

    People are right to be concerned about that joke, but only because stupid people, not realizing it’s about them will take it as an arguement for eugenics. But that shouldn’t be a problem as long as smart people keep them in check.

    Look up Carlo M. Cipolla and the The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity for some amazing insight.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Jesus Christ my man

      You are talking about eugenics. This stuff killed millions of people. There is no actual evidence supporting what you are saying and there is no such thing as “stupid people.” You probably should watch your language.

    • Garbagio@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah bro just a throwaway line at the beginning. And the end. And several times in between. And never provides anything otherwise, let alone related to your “alternative” reading.

      Why the hell can’t it just be a funny, problematic, 2000’s comedy? Why does everyone that jokes that it’s a parody or documentary or whatever need to write academic statements of purpose on how “ackshually, if you read The Basic Laws if Human Stupidity by Carlo M. Cipolla (2 L’s), you will clearly see the hidden intent behind Luke Wilson’s magnum opus 🤓”

      • halvar@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I have to admit it’s been some time since I saw the movie, but I have three relevant scenes in mind.

        First is the beggining where they lay down that joke.

        The next is in the ending, where the main cast has children and the children of the smart guy are smart and the children of the dumb guy are dumb.

        Judging from these too it seems like in the word of Idiocracy eugenics works, as in smart people really produce smart offspring, which pretty much makes it a problematic 2000s comedy, so you’re welcome.

        Now the next scene is also from the start of the movie. It could be summed up as: “Stupid people kept doing stupid things, while smart people were occupied with inventing medicines for stopping baldness and enlarging penises.”

        And that last one sells it for me. A society doesn’t decay because of genetic drift, it decays because smart people get dragged along tying to respond to the needs of the stupid people. Unlike the first two scenes, the third is no joke. That is something that WILL happen if smart people don’t keep stupid people in check and that WILL lead to the decay of society.

        In conclusion: Idiocracy has tones of eugenics as a joke. Not to be taken seriously. If you take it seriously seek help. It does warn of a present where most people are stupid, dressed up as the future. It does warn of smart people responding to the needs of stupid people, while important things are left unattained for.