• tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I don’t think they were implying that at all. Instead imagine the situation where you send your spouse into a burning building and then they go out the back door and don’t call you. If the wife was afraid the seller was a murderer, this isn’t a case of needing to know where their partner is 24/7. It’s knowing where their partner is after what they view is a very unsafe situation.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Maybe a lamp isn’t worth sending your husband to ‘certain death’ then. If you’re really that concerned about buying off FB marketplace just go to HomeGoods™ ffs, they’ve got lamps too.

      Guess that is more of an indication of her priorities, “a possible chance at a discount on this mass produced lamp is worth the chance that my husband literally dies.”

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        I was using an extreme example. She was afraid of being murdered, doesn’t mean that she is afraid of the same for her husband. All it means is that it’s a different situation. It has nothing to do with tracking your husband’s whereabouts 24/7

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      One could argue that thinking the woman selling a lamp on Facebook marketplace is a murderer is an unusually paranoid thought

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Frankly, I can easily imagine them going “hey let’s got for a beer and see which one of our two paranoiacs freaks out first”.