Lately I’ve been noticing that the people who mainly should not have children, whether due to economic limitations, illnesses, or even mental instability, are the ones who have the most children, and many times they end up as single fathers/mothers. My question is whether it would be a good idea to implement some kind of regulation and set minimum requirements that must be met, mainly to prevent the child from ending up in the future as a criminal or a social burden due to those factors.

  • BigBolillo@mgtowlemmy.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I’m not trying to normalize anything, I’m just asking for the opinion of other people about this, I was just thinking about it recently but there are no hidden intentions here.

      • BigBolillo@mgtowlemmy.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Ok genius tell me what my hidden intentions are, and why my instance has something to do with it? I’m trying to get opinions from other people on Lemmy not to do whatever you feel I’m doing. Duh… you are weird.

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          trying to get opinions from other people on Lemmy

          Basically the “just asking questions” classic. mgtow is right wing bullshit, and it always has been. Your comment right before you made this post was on this topic, except you just outright said that stupidity was in people’s genes. You’re “just asking questions” about eugenics and then calling people weird, all while being on the mgtow instance. I might be weird, but at least I’m not on the mgtow instance with all the other right wing incel freaks that can’t get laid.

          Also, look at the rest of your comment history. It takes no genius to see through your BS.