As authoritarianism accelerates — as government-sanctioned violence becomes more overt in immigration enforcement, in policing, in the open deployment of federal force against civilians, and in the steady erosion of civil rights — people are scrambling for reference points.

But instead of reckoning with the long and violent architecture of U.S. history, much of this searching collapses into racialized tropes and xenophobic reassurance: This isn’t Afghanistan. This isn’t Iran or China. This is America. We have rights. This is a democracy. This isn’t who we are.

These statements are meant to comfort. They are meant to regulate fear, to calm the nervous system with the promise that no matter how bad things get, this country is somehow exempt from the logic of repression. Instead, they reveal how deeply many people still misunderstand both this country and the nature of authoritarian power.

They rest on a dangerous fiction: that large-scale state violence, political terror, and repression belong somewhere else — to “failed states,” to the Global South, to places imagined as perpetually unstable. This is not only historically false; it is how people in the U.S. have been trained not to recognize what is being built in front of them.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      This article?

      I didn’t get that at all. This isn’t both sidesing any issue. I don’t think they even mention Republicans or Democrats/Left or Right even once. It’s just holding up a mirror to say this is us.

      If anything it should remind people that if you want your America, you need to be ready to shape it by being more aware of the narratives being created. You can still make the America and the future you want by demanding your rights, especially the right to vote.

      “This isn’t America,” they insist, as if the U.S. were not a place that has repeatedly refined its methods of control while keeping its hierarchies intact.

      If we treat this moment as an exception, we will look for solutions that restore a past that never existed. If we understand it as part of a longer pattern, we can begin to ask better questions: What would safety look like without punishment? Order without domination? Belonging without exclusion? And what would it require to protect one another — not from some imagined future, but from the systems that have always been with us?

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      If my opponent is the government and Republicans are really good at getting things done while Democrats are terrible at it, then it makes sense for me to vote for Democrats as they’ll be a weaker opponent.

      Both sides are absolutely not the same. One is feckless and spineless so I’d rather fight them.