There’s a live stream tomorrow on the 'tube setting up a MeshCore companion for sending messages over radio waves directly instead of relying on internet providers.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 小时前

    BTW, Meshcore is MIT and not fully FOSS, while Meshtastic is GPL and fully FOSS.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 小时前

        Fact, but since that’s common and cheap, and I’m not aware of an equivalent FOSS alternative, I’d go with Meshtastic, if were to dabble. And I dabble. :D

        • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          7 小时前

          I believe the only part of Meshcore that’s not FOSS is the official app, and there’s a FOSS alternative.

          Personally, I’d use Meshcore. I tried MT for a month or so. I never saw a conversation, just a few scattered “test” messages. Meanwhile, on MC, I was away from my phone for 4 hours yesterday and came back to 250+ coherent messages in a conversation from all over the region (not to mention the hundreds of test messages).

          MT is better in ad-hoc situations since clients can repeat messages, but MC is better for establishing a region-wide communication network.

          • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 小时前

            Agreed. Oddly enough, my Meshtastic contacts are much farther away than my farthest MeshCore contacts but MeshCore seems to be much livelier.