Harris may have been light on policy, but she was able to bait an ‘unhinged’ Trump into a number of traps

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    She answered coherently but rarely in a direct way. I heard 3 numbers and 0 policy positions other than Roe V Wade

    I did miss the first 30 min so

    Trump didn’t answer anything and just attacked which is fucking pathetic

    • ravhall@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      She made firm statements on a number of topics. None as firm as RvW, lol. She really came down hard on that one. I would like to see more of that.

      I would not say that I am thrilled with her as a candidate, but at least now I don’t feel like I’m throwing my vote away just to keep Trump out of office. I’m sure she will be a fine president, and since she has the support of so many Republicans at this point I think she has more of a chance at that “bipartisan” thing everyone keeps yapping about.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re expecting the wrong thing if you are watching a debate with trump involved and think you’re going to hear policy. That’s not what debate are for.

      • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just because Trump is involved doesn’t mean it is no longer a debate.

        The factyou think this is the reason your country is FUCKED