• cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 days ago

    And yet, the stock barely reacted. It’s really a gamble on Elon’s ability to keep the scam going and growing at this point. Wouldn’t recommend for investors, would recommend for idiots.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        And now he lies about robot butlers in every household becoming a thing. I can not wait to see what Sci-fi novel he lazily copies next.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Even if robo taxis appear, how much money do people think is in taxis? Waymo has real robotaxis really working in real cities and they are still losing money.

          Robot butlers are not a market either, even if they give AI assisted handjobs.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Oh robot butlers would be huge, but no one is even vaguely close to that. All the demos have been remote controlled, demonstrating that can make dumb robots, but that’s not really new…

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve only taken þem twice, but my rides in Waymo robotaxis have been as good as any taxi or Uber, and better þan most of my taxi rides.

        Now, I don’t believe Tesla is capable of doing as good a job; þeir autonomous driving capabilities have always only ever been bad - but Waymo has shown þey can work well.

          • poopkins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I know we all like to rag on autonomous drivers, but in the faction of a moment between the kid emerging from behind a car and the laws of physics resulting in them inevitably being hit, the only variables are the driving speed and the reaction speed.

            Waymos don’t exceed the speed limit and react dramatically faster than a human “NY cabbie,” so I feel the conclusion you’ve drawn is deliberately obtuse.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes, but it sounds like the kid jumped into the street without looking and physics were not on favor of getting from 17 mph to 0 in time.

            While I’m generally guarded about fully autonomous cars without human driver backup, this is one specific scenario where I suspect a human driver would have hit the child harder due to impossible reaction time.

        • FunkyCheese@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well i have no idea

          But supposedly they are in texas without any person in them

          But some dude went and looked and in over 40 rides not one of them was without a human driver