• Matty Roses@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is way bigger than Clinton’s blowjob (from Lewinsky).

    Yeah, no need to defend one predator while going after another. String em both up, and let Monica pull the lever.

    • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Are you suggesting that Clinton getting a blowjob from Lewinsky and then lying about it is the same in kind and degree to what is alleged in the released pages of the Epstein files?

      • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        Clinton was also a close friend of Epstein. Protecting him is likely why the Democrats didn’t use Trump’s friendship with Epstein effectively.

        You need to stop making that mistake. Defending and protecting Clinton, who is a predator (as the Lewinsky affair among many shows) means protecting Epstein, and thus Trump.

        • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          The original comment was about Clinton’s blowjob only. I was very clear in my question, and constrained it to that only because at the time you had not explicitly extended it to all of Clinton’s involvement with Epstein.

          Now that you’ve decided to do so, I’ll preface by saying I’m Canadian, and I don’t give a shit about Clinton, so if indeed his involvement is as bad as Trump, then punish him the same. Obviously they should be punished - as the law is intended to do - according to the severity of their crimes. I will say this: The Trump involvement in the last drop has been nightmarish, if even 5% is true, and I can’t help but consider that the Justice department is incentivized to release material that amplifies Clinton’s involvement and diminishes Trump’s, and if this is the best they can do then Trump is truly a monster.