gigastasio@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 10 hours agoWhat fictional animal do you think would be the most delicious?message-squaremessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up137arrow-down13
arrow-up134arrow-down1message-squareWhat fictional animal do you think would be the most delicious?gigastasio@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 10 hours agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squarebstix@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up18·9 hours agoPulled Winnie the Pooh. It’s honey marinated and fat.
minus-squareBoomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoEating bear is how you get brain worms tho
minus-squarejustdaveisfine@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 hours agoI believe one of the lines from the song is ‘stuffed with fluff’ so I don’t know, could be a little fuzzy.
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up6·8 hours agoThis. Winnie the Pooh is canonically a teddy bear, presumably only alive by some sort of magic. Likewise, Kanga, Roo, Eeyore, Tigger and Piglet. Rabbit and Owl, however, were real, living creatures - the true inhabitants of the wood - with related magic allowing them to interact. So basically, yes, Pooh isn’t edible.
Pulled Winnie the Pooh.
It’s honey marinated and fat.
Eating bear is how you get brain worms tho
I believe one of the lines from the song is ‘stuffed with fluff’ so I don’t know, could be a little fuzzy.
This. Winnie the Pooh is canonically a teddy bear, presumably only alive by some sort of magic. Likewise, Kanga, Roo, Eeyore, Tigger and Piglet.
Rabbit and Owl, however, were real, living creatures - the true inhabitants of the wood - with related magic allowing them to interact.
So basically, yes, Pooh isn’t edible.
This is the winner