• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    God, you’re so smarmy when you can’t think of an actual point. Do you not realize how transparent it is?

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Yes. It’s obvious that you’re acting smarmy to cover the gaps whenever you have nothing, to cover all the holes in your argument. It’s like you think if you just act smug, people won’t notice when you’re cornered and have no actual response.

        It doesn’t work. It’s transparent. You’re not actually covering up the holes in your reasoning, you’re just demonstrating that you don’t care about how many holes there are in your reasoning, because you’re intellectually dishonest.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          I have nothing? I’ve shown that it wasn’t terrorism, including by your definition.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            No, you haven’t. I have shown that it was terrorism, even by your definition though. You don’t care and just keep adding on extra stipulations that aren’t in your definition.

            He never took credit for that violence, in fact, he tried to pretend it wasn’t him

            Nowhere in either definition, at all. Complete non sequitor.

            He never made any demands

            Nowhere in either definition, at all. Complete non sequitor.

            Just like the location is irrelevant. Just like every extra stipulation you pull out of your ass is irrelevant.