She by no means has a layup trying to win in Texas. This doesn’t belong here.

deleted by creator

No, we actually want reddit to lose because FOSS models of worth will be completely impossible if we allow AI to be treated this way by copyright, instead of the obvious sane conclusion which should be that its up to the people who’ve used the tools to pass copyright tests by traditional means, as in, was the work transformatively different to an extent that it is different work?

I think perhaps there could be something to be said for FOSS ai simply not having damages, but I really think we ought not be so gun happy with regulating AI, because some of the biggest proponents of regulation, are AI companies, and I think that should be really telling to us.

They know they’re the only ones with the funding to acquire enough material “legitimately”, so they are building moats via regulatory capture, and many people, being too happy to jump in resistance to AI are helping them get the worst possible outcome for our freedom.

Assuming UK cops aren’t as utterly as untrustworthy as north american cops, (which you probably are purely because you don’t always bring around a gun), what are you meant to do with a knife attack? Wack people with a stick? Run away and called for armed backup? I assume the latter, but what about in the immediate?

I think they got this, but were inferring that you were describing order (which would make the order listed incorrect) as opposed to simply listing 2 things (what I believe you were doing).

Its ok to abandon tradition for no reason at all.

Trying to get other people to do something just because other people did it is often a dick move.