It’s the second such lawsuit from Reddit since it sued another major AI company, Anthropic, in June.

But the lawsuit filed Wednesday is different in the way that it confronts not just an AI company but the lesser-known services the AI industry relies on to acquire online writings needed to train AI chatbots.

“Scrapers bypass technological protections to steal data, then sell it to clients hungry for training material. Reddit is a prime target because it’s one of the largest and most dynamic collections of human conversation ever created,” said Ben Lee, Reddit’s chief legal officer, in a statement Wednesday.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reddit themselves stole something that they didn’t create and only questionably have rights to, which is the content of their users.

    Reddit didn’t make reddit. Reddit users paid the server costs for over a decade. Reddit users built and managed every single community. Adding to that, reddit is and always has been trash, especially from a software perspective. Reddit barely played a role in building reddit.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    I can’t believe they’re fighting over who gets access to my shitposts. I wouldn’t trust an AI trained on the bullshit I made up.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I like Perplexity. Unlike most LLMs, it actually cites it’s sources, making it much easier to differentiate truth from slop.

  • badbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I give perplexity full rights to any content I posted over the decades of using reddit.

  • Yardy Sardley@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bank robbers lmao. Banks at least have the integrity to pretend they didn’t create all their money out of thin air.

    • jared@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      And banks never leave cash easily accessible and spread out all over the place.

  • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    So if Reddit wins, then the data that was used is worth something and Meta is screwed for their piracy. And if Reddit loses, they lose. This feels like a win win, no?

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, we actually want reddit to lose because FOSS models of worth will be completely impossible if we allow AI to be treated this way by copyright, instead of the obvious sane conclusion which should be that its up to the people who’ve used the tools to pass copyright tests by traditional means, as in, was the work transformatively different to an extent that it is different work?

      I think perhaps there could be something to be said for FOSS ai simply not having damages, but I really think we ought not be so gun happy with regulating AI, because some of the biggest proponents of regulation, are AI companies, and I think that should be really telling to us.

      They know they’re the only ones with the funding to acquire enough material “legitimately”, so they are building moats via regulatory capture, and many people, being too happy to jump in resistance to AI are helping them get the worst possible outcome for our freedom.