Some of you are real power users, we are now changing billing from a fixed monthly cost to usage based. The price will be $1 per BILLION CPU instructions, quite the deal! And if you get our “Social Media+” package all compute for Facebook, Xitter, and TikTok is half off!

Reviewing large AI PRs is the worst. I think being verbose is a good thing through function and variable naming, and comments for head scratching bits of cose, but AI can take it to an extreme degree with comments everywhere. Reading and critequing/discussing code and patterns used to be one of my favorite parts of the job.

My coworker who’s fully in bed with AI barely understood the code he wrote before, but asking him a question now is just an indirect means of using Claude. It has gotten to the point where I’m writing my PR comments more in the style of a prompt because it’s obvious he just pastes them in to Claude anyway.

Flock cameras :)

Yeah, people really need to stop pretending AI slop still produce wonky hands and smeared background. Yes, you will still find those, but you can’t rely on that anymore. Even videos when well made are hard to tell if it’s AI or not.

INAL and even further away from am American one, but I shall inboke the law of Cunningham . Having the company recognising or just generally being okay with the union formation makes the whole process easier. No hiding your unionisation activities and such. I believe the role of the union-buster is to dissuade the employees from signing up to it, see if there’s any dirt on union leaders to have then fired, and to just generally be a royal pain in the arse for everyone.

If I got the story right a bunch of Blizzard developers got fired because they shared company secrets/IP in the same discord server they discussed their unionisation work, so Blizzard’s lawyers found an easy way to get rid of them.

I do agree it’s an odd choice not to fix it, and I do wish they would. But for now it’s a risk I’m fine with taking. If my server gets DOSd in the future from multiple unauthenticated streams I sure will be a grumpy git and complain to them, but in the mean time uuh… sharing is caring? 😅

I think you’ve fundamentally misunderstood some of their communication.

There’s the issue I described earlier where it is possible to stream files unauthenticated if you know the folder structure on the video. The devs have responded that they won’t fix this. Outside of streaming content, there’s no other access through this mean. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/1501

Then there’s the release of 10.11.7 that fixed a number of security issues. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/releases/tag/v10.11.7 with no major security issues since then. And all the issues were privilagr escalation for a normal user account on jellyfin. So the attacker would already needed to have an account on your server, and only the data that jellyfin could see was at risk, nothing escaped contagion so to say.

They also officially support a reverse proxy set up: https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/post-install/networking/reverse-proxy/.

I have no idea where you’ve got the idea where they themselves claim it’s unsecure to open it to the internet. Of course there’s always a risk associated with exposing something, but jellyfin doesn’t pose any larger risk than anything else you might publish.

Do you have any proof that it’s not secure?

Unfortunately for a Plex style easy to share library you need it to be centralized, handing over a lot of power to whoever is controlling it.

Why not? Unless you’re talking about unauthenticated steaming of media if you reverse engineer a servers folder structure.

That’s exactly what someone I shouldn’t be trusting would say!

I can see the logic in that 🙂

That would make sense, but the “+ 1 - 1” both inside the patenethis don’t, as he also has the “+ 1” outside. I assume ( making an ass of me along the way) he tried to write the formula you described from memory, but cocked it up a bit.

I don’t think it’s as complicated as setting up an arr stack (I know it was hyperbole, dw :p). Maybe it’s because most of the films I aquire already come with subs, but surely there are plugins that make getting them fairly easy?

I don’t think the price of space x shares matter at all to someone who didn’t know it released recently. And if they decided they suddenly do care, they could just open the article and read it.

But they are fucking up other people’s projects. Badly enough that some are ending paid bug hunting programs or just eating so much of maintainers time looking through bogus bug reports that development stalls.

Imagine if you saw you unknowingly had a couple of assists. Or seeing someone with a concerning number of deaths.

So does everyone have a 1:1 relationship to each other? For example I will see a 6 above my dad’s head, but you’ll see a 20? (yes, I’m implying you fart way more than me)

Herr’s a handy video to explain the difference. Too bad I can never remember anything said.

Like, sometimes these things would be quite useful for me. I’m someone who goes into fight or flight (often fight) when I receive a leas than positive email at work. Having something smart enough to interrupt me before I do something hasty and tell me to puss off for a couple of minutes first would be really useful. But a system like that can’t ever live I’m the hands of someone I don’t trust.

It’s like immich. The idea of having an AI go through all your images and labeling them is something I usually balled at with google or meta, but when it’s all local on my machine and I can turn it on or off at will makes all the difference.