Ehh…
Gödel basically showed we can never know which “mathematics” is the “correct one”.
“Proven true assuming my axioms are true” is closer to reality.
Why, a hexvex of course!
Ehh…
Gödel basically showed we can never know which “mathematics” is the “correct one”.
“Proven true assuming my axioms are true” is closer to reality.


Online course generally implies online assessment.
The level of academic misconduct in those is insane; I caught 35% of my cohort cheating (using a method (one we never taught) they could not replicate in an in-person test) one year, and those were the ones I could prove. Online assessments just test what a search engine/AI knows really.
(For those about to tout “lockdown browsers”; it’s called “a second laptop” or just “my phone”)


I’m afraid I need to know where to purchase these in the UK. It’s a matter of vital cational security, erm I mean national security obviously.


The flavour profile has been described as "being punched in the mouth by a bowl of potpourri " by a colleague of mine.


Take a 6 month vacation and then negotiate double my pay when they frantically try to rehire me.


That’s about par for the course.
So far, the current UK government seems to realise they’ve lost their voters; thus they’re trying to appeal to the opposition’s voters.
The trouble is, no-one really wants censorship laws save for small (but vocal) pockets religious nuts masquerading as feminists.
We’ve normalised “if you are against x, you are a vile monster” kind of thinking; and thus we are now facing sweeping censorship.
A lot of the issue with logic problems is the “common sense” element required. With purely geometric problems, there are less of these to worry about.
Chess problems also work well to teach logical step application.
I’m the guy in the background saying “go back to teaching Euclid and proof in schools”, as the real point was to teach logical deduction from established facts.


I’m ok with this - lubuntu has my back.


Any good alternatives for those of us stuck in “pay or ok” land?


Darkest dungeon - though you need to make it to the ending to find out why you’re evil.


Honestly? I’m on the 3rd cycle with my AAAs (used for an MP3 and small electronics) and the 2nd for my AAs.
I’ve not noticed them lasting less, and I’ve already made back what disposables would cost.
Bonus: I charge them at work because why not.
It’s even worse, their net was $132 billion
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/GOOGL/alphabet/net-income
So even after expenses, the profit of alphabet group was obscene.


Apples to oranges - open source is generally done as a charitable act; onlyfans is a profit driven industry.
The former is out to make the software ecosystem richer, the latter is out to make themselves richer (or has no choice).
An interesting note is that OF replaced the informal system that had evolved on Tumblr, and was designed to be less exploitative than mainstream pornography - in this the evidence suggests it has been successful. It, of course, exploits male loneliness like a well oiled machine, but that’s (apparently) ok.


Does this mean I’m non-trinary?


So essentially laying the groundwork to microtransactions for video game guides?
Clearly fake - no-one puts first supervisor in their email signature!


I got mine 2 (or shit, is it 3 now) years ago - 10/10 best laptop purchase in a long while.
GPD have done well for themselves in the small screen laptop space!
Here we are; a controversial take on something almost accurate. The context is there for the feminist - women only organisations as safe spaces for women to talk about the issues the patriarchy inflicts upon them.
However, the implication goes beyond the context - “man bad, no want woman safe space” is heavily implied; it’s there but just deniable enough to ragebait, allowing a feminist talking point reply. An excellent trolling strategy, though possibly a self defeating one.
The trouble is, this tactic tends to alienate rather than convert. As a historical example; Megalia’s use of this tactic created pushback from the very group it sought to defeat. Is this a measure of success, or is it an indication of self defeating anger? Tricky call.