Maybe, or it could just mean saying gay and trans rights exist while being otherwise apolitical. Or a million other things.

Also, leaning left according to MAGA mom… who knows what that really means.

Fuck Waymo, fuck cars.

But eating wild carrots is fun. I recommend eating wild carrot but not eating hemlock. That’s worked well for me so far.

Makes sense. Peak of the “America can do no wrong” hubris.

I didn’t find a direct reference to the creation of immigration courts but maybe I missed it.

The immigration courts being subordinate to the executive branch seems so insane and in contradiction to the entire way the American legal system was designed. Who thought this was a good idea?

This probably won’t help but I get excited when I see people in these mobility scooters. It’s nice to see options for people with mobility issues to get around without having to drive (or be driven) everywhere.

I think we gotta normalize considering these being rad as hell but I know we’re not there yet.

There’s a difference between the legal concept as it relates to the constitution and the broader ethical principle on which the first amendment was based.

We can still talk about the ideal of free speech outside of the government. In fact, this ties into the myth of “free enterprise” which suggests that everything companies do is about freedom but everything the government does is about tyranny. This is obviously nonsense but we’re so indoctrinated to it that we rarely question it fully.

You’re in an echo chamber. There’s been conflicting evidence but no clear ideology that I have seen confirmed. The left is only focused on the evidence he was a right winger and if you go to right-wing forums they’re fixated on the things that suggest he was left-wing.

But we really don’t know for sure. Which still makes Trump’s actions unhinged but that usually goes without saying.

“Accidentally”

Is there any actual evidence this guy was even a groyper at this point? The evidence I saw was pretty unconvincing.

Thanks.

Link?

Yeah we literally just had the mobster in chief order a hit on 11 random civilians in a boat. If you believe in the sanctity of human life, isn’t that 11 times as bad? Yet the media hasn’t even bothered to report their names.

Still wastes their time.

I’m worried the courts might rule that way although they shouldn’t.

https://publichealth.jhu.edu/center-for-gun-violence-solutions/research-reports/gun-violence-in-the-united-states

Carrying firearms in public also increases the risk for violence by escalating minor arguments and increasing the chances that a confrontation will become lethal. Research has found that even the mere presence of a firearm increases aggressive thoughts and actions.20

Some believe that carrying a firearm will act as a deterrent and help prevent conflicts or minimize harm. While there are specific examples where this was true, there are many more cases where firearm carrying escalates conflict and leads to firearm injury or death. In aggregate, research shows firearm carrying increases levels of violent crime.21

Not just for assassins. Carrying a gun is negative for your physical safety in general.

Lol Americans are so privileged to think that this is as bad as it can get.