Trump wants to deport them to Venezuela. And said no one really knows where they are all from.
Once again showing, for as huge a dumbass as JD is, Trump is dumber still.
25+ yr Java/JS dev
Linux novice - running Ubuntu (no windows/mac)
Trump wants to deport them to Venezuela. And said no one really knows where they are all from.
Once again showing, for as huge a dumbass as JD is, Trump is dumber still.
All things in moderation. The world is a spinning plate and extremes are to be avoided. Instead, the correct course is an ephemeral point somewhere around the middle which we must continually chase as it moves in response to the world. We all do our best to balance the world a little closer to what we want it to be.
Assuming I am even making sense of what you’re asking, because this is pretty unclear.
Wasn’t he just posting memes of her two weeks ago? lol. He’s jilted.
Nope. No idea how that works. I assume someone rich says they’ll donate a million bucks to match smaller donors, but I really don’t have a clue what it’s supposed to mean.
I donated $25, and then another $15 with a 4x match (got that email after) just to send my approval of the debate performance. That’s on top of $25 at 3x earlier.
All of that after being out of work for 5 months. It’s not much, but it’s what I could do. That’s not meant to brag. We can’t have Trump.
They are scared of younger swift fans who weren’t planning on voting at all.
Irony, thy name is Vance.
He has concepts of plans.
I appreciate you pointing this out. Today is literally my first day on the job after 5 months, but I’ll throw some cash their way after a check or two.
Idk. Been doing it for nearly 20 years and before that I was doing IBM’s take on VBScript for another 10. So I have my own perspective there. I’ve only ever had to parse massive xmls when doing web apps, and for web backends I really only like Java and NodeJS.
But everyone is entitled to their own take. I would imagine there is a streaming parser in other languages as well.
Maybe look into StAX?
You made a lot of points here. Many I agree with, some I don’t, but I specifically want to address this because it seems to be such a common misconception.
It does and it doesn’t discard the original. It isn’t impossible to recreate the original (since all the data it gobbled up gets stored somewhere in some shape or form and can be truthfully recreated, at least judging by a few comments bellow and news reports). So AI can and does recreate (duplicate or distribute, perhaps) copyrighted works.
AI stores original works like a dictionary does. All the words are there, but the order and meaning is completely gone. An original work is possible to recreate by randomly selecting words from the dictionary, but it’s unlikely.
The thing that makes AI useful is that it understands the patterns words are typically used in. It orders words in the right way far more often than random chance. It knows “It was the best of” has a lot of likely options for the next word, but if it selects “times” as the next word, it’s far more likely to continue with, “it was the worst of times.” Because that sequence of words is so ubiquitous due to references to the classic story. But over the course of following these word patterns, it will quickly glom onto a different pattern and create a wholly new work from the original “prompt.”
There are only two cases in which an original work should be duplicated: either the training data is far too small and the model is overtrained on that particular work, or the work is the most derivative text imaginable lacking any flair or originality.
Adding more training data makes it less likely to recreate any original works.
I am aware of examples where it was claimed an LLM reproduced entirely code functions including original comments. That is either a case of overtraining, or far too many people were already copying that code verbatim into their own, thus making that work very over represented in the training data (same thing, but it was infringing developers who poisoned the data, not researchers using bad training data).
Bottom line: when created with enough data, no original works are stored in any way that allows faithful reproduction other than by chance so random that it’s similar to rolling dice over a dictionary.
None of this means AI can do no wrong, I just don’t find the copyright claim compelling.
Good to hear. I always get clumping on the spoon no matter how well I stir.
I see no MAGA stuff there. I’m in the other echo chamber, must be (and happily so).
Rated by a review board? 4 out of 5 dentists? One fucking girl who doesn’t want it anyway?
My wife loves my cock in every hole and that’s the only review that matters to me.
I don’t think it’s a failure to communicate. I think it’s a case of you injecting your agenda where it doesn’t apply because you want a soapbox to stand on. That is off-putting and alienating. Chime in with your spiel when it’s appropriate to the context. Police protecting me has nothing to do with presidential succession and it’s weird to bring it up in that context.
In another context I might well agree with you, but right now it feels like an attempt to redirect to make this about your agenda. You don’t need me for that.
You’ve got some kind of agenda here and I don’t even know if I agree with it or not, but it has nothing to do with what I said here.
That’s a poor paraphrasing of what I said. I’m not going to the capital with a gun. All I need is a safe transfer of power to the duly elected president.
Something something sharks?