Shadowedcross

People like to say they bring money in through tourism. How much? I don’t know, but I have to imagine the percentage of tourists who come here because of the monarchy is very small.

It’s a topic I have a lot of interest in, so of course I’m going to discuss it if the opportunity presents itself, especially if I disagree with what’s been said. If you yourself don’t care about the discussion, why did you bother joining it? And I’ve tried being civil, can you say the same about your childish message?

I edited my reply after I saw your edit.

I’m not the one who started this discussion on what touch typing means, I’ve just given my view on it. Perhaps I could’ve phrased it more softly, but I won’t deny it’s what I think. And again, I agree with your assertion, but only when specificity is actually required. Otherwise, if you’re going to claim, outside of those contexts, that touch typing only refers to a specific technique, then yes, I think you are being pedantic.

EDIT: Since I replied to your initial comment, I’ll update this one too. There definitely is some confusion with regard to your analogy. The point I was trying to make is that while Taekwondo is a type of martial art, it has different styles. From my point of view, you think only a specific style meets the definition of Taekwondo, and all others are something else entirely. If I were to choose a different name, I’d say something like 10-finger, or the home row technique. But I’m not going to try and force you to use any term other than what you want to use. I just have my own opinion on when it’s appropriate to be strict and precise in its definition.

I feel like we’re talking about two different things. Touch typing, regardless of the technique used, only implies looking away from the keyboard. If you’ve got the muscle memory, and instinctively know where keys are, whether that’s through technique or reinforced familarity, you can look wherever you want.

My man, I’m not insecure at all. Why would I be? I don’t think one technique is any better, or worse, than another, and I’m happy enough with my typing ability. What I don’t like, is people being childish and resorting to mockery when people are trying to have a discussion.

Language doesn’t work like that. In professional and educational contexts? Yeah, it’ll likely refer to a specific technique. But in general? Absolutely not. I’m calling it pedantic because the technique is just that - a technique. I’m not claiming that it has anything to do with skill, WPM, or accuracy, just that they’re the same in those regards. On that point, your analogy doesn’t really work for me, since we have very different views on the topic. You think touch typing is only a specific technique, whereas I think it has a less restrictive definition, certainly in everyday use. To use the same analogy, for me it’s like you’re saying only it’s only Taekwondo if it’s a specific style of Taekwondo.

It makes me feel sorry for your apparent idiocy.

No, they won’t. The specific technique is just a standardised way of educating people. It isn’t inherently better than a technique that an individual has developed on their own. Might the specific technique be more efficient in terms of movement? Perhaps. But if someone has found a technique that works for them, it might also be what’s most efficient for them. But in terms of speed and accuracy? They’re the same.

There is no significant difference in WPM or accuracy between people who were self-taught, and those who had formal education. Refusing to call it touch typing, simply because it isn’t using a specific technique, is pedantic at best.

I know what they’re referring to. And I’m saying that if you use keyboards enough, you will naturally develop the muscle memory required for touch typing.

deleted by creator

Well, I have two of the four at least.

Neither as much as I’d like. My mum died 5 years ago, and my dad is in his late 70s and likely suffering from dementia. So between that and my own issues, there’s not really much opportunity to develop our understanding of each other.

Remember when buying a PC was semi-affordable? That was nice. Now it’s transitioning into a luxury product.

I’m not bi, but I can still appreciate masculine beauty. Beauty is beauty, after all, regardless of someone’s gender.

Well, I do like free stuff.

And what about people who feel exhausted by every type of social interaction? Because that’s my experience. I’m not saying it cannot change over time, but labels can still be useful. When someone describes themselves as an introvert, nobody assumes they are drained by every single interaction. People generally understand it as a way of describing how someone responds to strangers or groups, rather than how they respond to all interaction.

There is nothing wrong with that. A label can help someone express a pattern they recognise in themselves without believing they are trapped by it. It is simply a way of communicating how they tend to feel in certain situations. Many people adopt mindsets that feel natural or comfortable without assuming those mindsets define them forever.

I think my issue isn’t so much understanding them, but remembering them, especially when there’s a lot. My ADHD simply doesn’t let me remember so much information at once, maybe if I spent a good amount of time reading the rules, memorising them, preparing myself, etc.

This is why I refuse to play boardgames, even though my partner and our friends really like playing tabletop simulator. I think it’s a fun combination of my ADHD and anxiety. The ADHD struggling to understand instructions, and my anxiety not wanting to embarrass myself by being unable to.