• 1 Post
  • 191 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 6th, 2023

help-circle

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyztopolitics @lemmy.worldStop Acting Like This Is Normal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    But it’s been about six months since Schumer decided that it wasn’t the time for a fight, that neither he nor the country was ready. Democratic leaders have had six months to come up with a plan. If there’s a better plan than a shutdown, great. But if the plan is still nothing, then Democrats need new leaders.

    We already know the Democrats need new leaders. Or more precisely, they need leaders, period.

    Schumer and Jeffries aren’t leaders - they’re high-ranking tools.

    That’s what they’ve demonstrated with their treatment of Mamdani. They hold the positions they hold because they have no principles and no integrity - because they’re owned by the donors and can be counted on to serve the interests of the donors regardless of any other considerations.

    And for the time being at least, the donors - even the most generally leftist of them - aren’t sufficiently opposed to what Trump is doing. They’d probably rather the tyrants have [D]s after their names than [R]s, and they’re undoubtedly personally offended by Trump, since he’s petulant and gauche and gross, but they don’t have any particular opposition really to a program to benefit the wealthy few (which necessarily includes themselves) at the expense of the common people (which is just a bunch of shabby people they don’t know), so while they’d certainly welcome efforts to make Trump look bad, they’re not really committed to stopping him. And I guarantee that some significant number of them are already daydreaming about what they’ll be able to do if/when the power that Trump has accumulated falls into the hands of a Democrat.

    And again - Schumer and Jeffries are their tools. We already see that with their refusal to support Mamdani.

    And I have little doubt that we’ll continue to see it in their failure to meaningfully oppose Trump.



  • Stoicism, properly understood, is in my opinion the only possibility humanity has for survival.

    Unfortunately, stoicism is rarely properly understood.

    Virtually every institutionalized societal evil exists at base because some number of people are stubbornly clinging to the delusion of control over others.

    As but one example, while the wave of trans bigotry exists because some number pf people believe that they should have the authority to control other people’s gender identifications, at heart it exists because those people believe that they can do so. That’s the foundation upon which their ever-more aggressive attempts are built. It’s really not a matter of whether they should or not - they literally can’t.

    Stoicism would’ve already informed them of that fact, and would’ve informed them of the harm that’s done - not merely to others but to themselves - by ignoring that fact.












  • Politics, in any form.

    Corporate, in any form.

    Police, in any form.

    Military, in any form.

    They all - I believe that institutionalized, hierarchical authority is rather obviously inherently destructive, and I couldn’t willingly take part. In fact, one of the things that perplexes me the most about politics in particular is that there are people who do willingly take part. I can only conclude that their brains are broken in some fundamental way such that they don’t see or don’t care about the harm they inevitably do.