

It should. This is straight up eugenics. No one should be making genetic fitness a priority when proposing state policy.


It should. This is straight up eugenics. No one should be making genetic fitness a priority when proposing state policy.


A “generation” of students aren’t prompt engineers. And even if you learned one useless skill in your major during college, you still have the entire rest of the program. I haven’t used many of the skills I learned in college and my industry has changed extensively since then, but learning those things contributed to a larger competency.


That sucks, but we’re not a real economy if we just keep bad companies afloat because people have invested in them. We certainly don’t need to filter any aid to unfortunate retirees in need through the stock market.


There’s a few other fascist states following Texas, so even if Texas fails CA is still necessary.


And Latinos are particularly meaningless. In addition to the oft cited differences in which nation they/their family came from, there are a lot of Latinos that are just white people with Spanish last names.


…Why is the deadline to file for a two year term midway through the existing one?


Her 2020 campaign wasn’t actually that good. She started with the same boost of optimism and then fell apart once she started defining specifics and every other statement was walking things back. She flamed out for a reason.
I agree with your statement here though. She had all the momentum and tools to win and flubbed it through actual choices, not some inherent insurmountable challenges.


If only our opponent hadn’t made a choice detrimental to us!


Another recent change was Trump pushing for the filibuster to be removed. The establishment could just claim it was because they need it to stop him so they should never stop him enough that he would make Republicans do it, but it could also be seen as a freedom they don’t want to have should we get a Democratic trifecta in the future. Being able to say “I want to do good things, but shucks the system stopped me” is a valuable tool for elected officials.


So it’s the caviest of caves, without even giving the Democrats anything. Are they worried that they were winning too much?


No, I mean he could raise way more than his defense will cost. He’s kind of one of the mythic figures of the resistance.
When the early revolution is recorded to history, we’ll remember such luminaries as the Portland Frog, Polka Dot Lady, and Sandwich Guy.


If he hasn’t crowd funded his legal expenses it’s because he’s actively choosing not to. He could be grifting this so hard.


I keep worrying that he’s going to use authoritarianism and a violation of the rule of law to do good things and people will normalize those things as ok, but he seems devoted to never helping anyone who isn’t rich or armed.


I think it would take some exceptional political gymnastics for Hochul to have personally campaigned with him and then justify how his election must be annulled. She’ll just refuse all his plans that need state approval. The state has a lot of power to just try to make him fail in order to teach the people that only neoliberals can be trusted to lead.
Direct Federal fuckery is more likely.


For every human that is moved into the state of Texas from New York you must transfer ownership of another human to the state.


What? Nothing here is evidence they want(ed) a shutdown. They’re refusing a SNAP funding bill because they want the poorly funded program to be leverage for reopening the government.
That they view feeding people, many of which are their own voters, as something that only Democrats care about shows their utter disinterest in supporting the rubes that vote for them, but none of this is part of some Republican master plan or advancing Republican causes.


They can, but your golden boy has not.


There’s another article about 6 in 10 saying the country is seriously off track. It’s hard to figure out the voter that says this and then is unsure who to vote for, but somehow that ends up with 8% saying “I don’t know”.


Sure, when you’re free. But if you’re under the absolute control of a government, not being able to just be lost is really important.
So if she’s not a terrorist and didn’t do anything criminal, that sure sounds like the officer shooting her is a criminal act.