• patrickA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Are you talking about the “xn—“ domain name? Because FYI that’s just a punycode domain. It’s pretty commonly used for non-ascii domains. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode

    The article itself is only available over Tor or I2P anyways though.

      • patrickA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You still think it’s sketchy?

        I’ve explained that it’s perfectly normal, that it’s just someone who wants to use Unicode in their domain name (in this case because they probably speak a non-ascii based language), and most good web clients should be showing that link as the Unicode characters. Firefox for example shows that as the proper Unicode directly.

        It literally is just a way for non-english speakers to have a domain name in their native language.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          People are usually aware enough to know that seeing Unicode characters in a URL looks wrong even if they don’t know why. Pair that with Punycode’s reputation for being abused by malicious actors and some clients not even showing the Unicode, and you have a link few are going to want to click on.

          It’s not that I don’t understand what you’re saying I was just commenting on the fact that nobody is going to want to click that link.