• google was a perfect product. I’m talking early 2000s.

    If it wasn’t for the need for endless growth it would have remained extremely profitable and competitive. but every quarter they have to show growth. Either buy making bs services they later kill, or buying profitable businesses then enshitifying them.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      google was a perfect product.

      No it wasn’t. It was the best in a bad batch of half-conceived search engines. And this was only true for a relative window of time in the '10s, when they hadn’t quite cornered the market on search and hadn’t fully optimized how to maximize their ad revenues.

      Google was a massive conflux of investor capital that produced a better-than-average set of tools as loss-leaders to hook you into their Walled Garden. Once you were inside the Walled Garden, what you discovered was Microsoft 2: Electric Boogaloo.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah, for a while there was really good progress on search results serving up the things you’re looking for, and not just by Google. I remember how impressed I used to be by the Amazon search engine. I could put a description of something that I didn’t know the name of into the search box and the first result was usually what I wanted. I could sort by user rating and usually get the best one on top.

      Now there are pages of sponsored products that keep getting shown if you keep scrolling. The search engine has become completely enshitified, and so many bots have created positive and negative reviews that the ratings are way less useful.