The president cited no evidence for his claims.

Research has found no evidence of increased rates of autism among those who are vaccinated compared to those who are not. Vaccines also undergo intensive safety testing. Research shows that genetics play a role in autism diagnoses. The NIH says some possible risk factors for autism include prenatal exposure to pesticides or air pollution, extreme prematurity or low birth weight, certain maternal health conditions, or parents conceiving at an older age.

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., said next month, the federal government’s Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health is “preparing a major new initiative focused on foundational causes and biology of autism.”

“We will examine every biologically plausible hypothesis and leave no legitimate, scientific question unexplored,” Kennedy said. “Mr. President, you have told us you want answers, so do I. We have just over two years to finish the work and I know you’re impatient. And we are moving with an urgency that that deadline demands. We will bring you actions and findings as soon as they are read.”

Mr. Trump promised “nothing bad can happen” from the research his administration is doing on autism.

    • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Another good one would be “Questionable Consent.”

      [from article ]We have just over two years to finish the work and I know you’re impatient.

      So, my evolving understanding of this is that it takes about that long for the first signs of autism to show up. So I have a few honest, unresolved questions.

      • With no ethics to slow us down we have to start witholding vaccines ASAP to hit the two year deadline. Is that correct?
      • MMR takes two shots to get full immunity. If the schedule is spread out and making the falsifiable assumption that vaccines cause autism, how long would it be before you could meaningfully prove it?
      • Again, with no ethics, you’d need for some of the population to get a placebo and some to get the real deal.
        • Is that correct?
        • Has a study that large ever been performed where placebo/real been kept track of over multiple doses?

      As it stands now I really don’t see how we get helpful data out of this.