• Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    No, she’s working on her own campaign. For people who want Trump elected, they’ll vote for Trump.

    I’m voting for Jill Stein, because I want Jill Stein to be elected.

    We get to vote for who we want to win. It’s our right.

      • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        2 days old. Because I got banned from Reddit. lmao

        And in these last 2 days, I’ve also started lemmy communites for a college, paraeducators, and the green party.

        So how long do you think should I wait before I can start posting about stuff I feel strongly about?

      • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        And I’ve made over 80 comments and posts on various topics. Not just “four posts shilling Stein the Russian asset.”

        Do you have any proof that she is a Russian asset? Because that seems like that would be front page news on news sites across the US. Please post your links here and also email the major news organizations with this proof if you have it.

        Plus that would be a good way to get rid of the Green Party. Then you wouldn’t have to worry about them anymore!

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/466594-jill-stein-i-am-not-a-russian-spy/

          Meeting with Putin was not a particularly good look, when Russia is one of the largest hydrocarbon producers on the planet and has significant interests in thawing Arctic seaways.

          Where Hilary meeting with Putin made a little more sense, as she was the country’s Secretary of State at the time, and talking with rival leaders is very much her job.

          More recent stuff is largely about Russian propaganda supporting her, likely just to help Trump though, due to his more authoritarian-friendly positions.

          • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            All this suggests is that the Russians tried to divert left leaning voters away from Clinton by boosting Stein’s candidacy.

            There is zero evidence there that Stein was contacted by Russia or even aware of the way in which her campaign was being hijacked.

              • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Dude, I’m voting for Jill Stein. And so are many of my friends. You should probably just accept it and let it go. If your candidate is strong enough, then you shouldn’t worry about who we vote for. :)

                • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You asked for evidence that Jill Stein is affiliated with the Russians. I provided some. Interesting how you now feel a need to pivot to me, personally.

                  • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    All this suggests is that the Russians tried to divert left leaning voters away from Clinton by boosting Stein’s candidacy. There is zero evidence there that Stein was contacted by Russia or even aware of the way in which her campaign was being hijacked.

                    You did not present evidence of that. If she was paid for by Russia, you don’t think that would be front page news? Come on, now…

    • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think there’s any issue with voting for Jill Stein, RFK or Mickey Mouse as long as you’re doing so with the full understanding that they will not win. As long as you’ve fully incorporated that into your mental calculus and it still seems to be the best course of action, do as ya like.

      While I agree it’s the right of every member of a democracy to vote for the candidate they think best, it’s also important to not be blinded by naive ideology and participate in these incredibly flawed systems pragmatically and practically, as they do not work in the way they advertise and must be manipulated in order to achieve the most positive possible outcome.

      Jill Stein winning a single vote in the electoral college is not a possible outcome.

      • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        as long as you’re doing so with the full understanding that they will not win.

        So should people only vote for who they think will win? Don’t you think that who you WANT to win is pretty important as a voter?

        Jill Stein winning a single vote in the electoral college is not a possible outcome.

        Because of the line of thinking that people should only vote for who they think will win.

        I personally vote for who I think would be best choice to be president. It’s now about who has the best chance of winning, or who I am afraid of winning. It’s who I would prefer to win. And for me, that’s Jill Stein.

        • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That is ideological naivety. You are operating with a belief in the way the world should work but not with an understanding of the way it currently works.

          Practically, this is almost a non-issue because as a single person you have so little impact on politics that your naivety is irrelevant. But it means that your actions may be counterproductive to your goals.

          • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You are operating with a belief in the way the world should work

            I agree with you. I know I have plenty of ideological naivety, but I believe the only way to change the system is for people to keep pushing for what they believe in. That’s why I’m voting for her.

            It’s a “be the change you want to see” situation.

            It’s also why, as a 55-year-old man, I decided to switch careers and move into education. I work in an elementary school now, making very little money, because I want to help better prepare our children for the future. Instead of just complaining, I chose to take action.

            Yes, I have a lot of ideological naivety, and I’m proud of it.

          • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m not ignoring reality at all.

            The “reality” is that here in the US, we have a right to vote for who we want. You can keep bullying and trying to get me to change my mind, but I am voting for who I want. And this year, it’s Jill Stein.

            • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Im not bullying you. You can vote for whoever you please, like you say.

              But the reality is, in the current broken election system, a vote for 3rd party is the same as putting your vote in the bin, or spoiling it

              • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                But the reality is, in the current broken election system,

                Very true. And the ONLY way to fix that election system is by voting for who we think will fix that, and not just who we think may win. When do we finally make this move?

                Everyone says, “Oh not THIS election. THIS election is too important to try to change things now!”

                Guess what? They have been fucking saying that for the last 50 years. lmao

                • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Yes, voting for a candidate who is almost guaranteed to not get elected, and end up with the party less likely to want to fix it.

                  good plan! good luck 👍

                  • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Yes, voting for a candidate who is almost guaranteed to not get elected,

                    So should we ONLY vote one we think is going to win then?

                    How about we vote for who we WANT to win. And I want Jill Stein to win. I don’t look at the odds, I look at the platform and the policies.

    • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s nice and correct, and I would love for the Green party to succeed, break the bipartisan dominance, and finally get a foothold in the government. However, at the moment, Trump needs to lose at all costs. At the moment, I believe all Stein is going to do is draw votes away from Harris and boost Trump’s ratio.

      Vote for who you want, by all means, but please, consider the impact in regard to the current political theatre.

      • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        You make a fair point, but I would argue that if Harris is such a great pick, then the Democrats shouldn’t have to worry. They should count on the strength of their candidate. My point is that if the candidate isn’t strong enough to win, regardless of “spoiler” votes, then they shouldn’t win.

        Let’s face it, almost half of the country doesn’t want Harris to win. And if more of them vote for their candidate than those who vote for Harris, then she loses. That’s democracy in action.

        • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s how democracy works in some countries, but not in the United States. We are currently stuck with the Electoral College, where the person who gets the most votes doesn’t necessarily win (see Hillary Clinton). So I’m not sure what you’re saying. I wish we lived in your world, but we don’t.

          • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            So I’m not sure what you’re saying.

            I think you know exactly what I’m saying. We are able to vote for whoever we want to win. So I am.

            And I totally agree we should get rid of the Electoral College.

            • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I think you know exactly what I’m saying.

              Let’s face it, almost half of the country doesn’t want Harris to win. And if more of them vote for their candidate than those who vote for Harris, then she loses. That’s democracy in action.

              It sounds like you’re saying you want to see Harris lose more than you want Stein to win. More than half the country doesn’t want Trump to win, but he will if Democrats are divided or if no party gets a majority.

              I also agree we should get rid of the Electoral College and have ranked choice voting, but that’s not the reality we live in. Voting as if the system is ideal will just result in Trump a Trump presidency like 2016.

              • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                It sounds like you’re saying you want to see Harris lose more than you want Stein to win.

                Not at all. I’m voting for who I want to win. As is my right.

                More than half the country doesn’t want Trump to win

                Then you shouldn’t be worried, then. Right?

                I also agree we should get rid of the Electoral College and have ranked choice voting, but that’s not the reality we live in.

                So maybe we should vote for people who want to change that. That’s what I’m doing.

                Voting as if the system is ideal will just result in Trump a Trump presidency like 2016.

                I don’t care. The world won’t end if Trump is president. You all said the same thing in 2016. And society is still here. And society will still be here in 4 years. I promise.

            • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I really don’t. You said:

              almost half of the country doesn’t want Harris to win. And if more of them vote for their candidate than those who vote for Harris, then she loses

              And based on how our system works, that’s simply not necessarily true. In this case it might be, but it also might not be. Here are a some examples:

              If some of the people who don’t want Harris to win, but also don’t want Trump to win vote for Stein or RFK, then those votes are likely to help Harris, but depending on where those votes are cast, they might also help Trump. If Harris loses Pennsylvania, even if she wins the national popular vote, she still might lose the election. If Harris wins all or most of the swing states, but Trump gets more popular votes, Harris still wins.

              See, “we are able to vote for whoever we want to win” is 100% true in theory, but depending on where you live, it’s a sad fact that your vote for the president counts less than someone else’s vote depending on where they live.

              We have one vote per person, but each vote does not carry the same weight. Wanting our two party system to change is healthy, casting your vote by pretending it will do something it wont, is not.

              • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                casting your vote by pretending it will do something it wont, is not.

                But voting for who I want to isn’t pretending at all. It’s one of the fundamental rights of being a US citizen.

                Even of YOU don’t like my candidate, I can still vote for her. I don’t like your candidate either, but I’m not bullying you to change your mind. lol

                • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  That’s 100% right, voting for who you want to is not pretending, but thinking it will do something that it won’t, absolutely is.

                  I’m sorry if I came across as bullying, that wasn’t my intention. You totally have the fundamental right to vote for whoever you want, it doesn’t matter what I think at all. I just feel strongly that people should have the most information possible about how our system works, because casting a vote for your preferred candidate, doesn’t mean that candidate necessarily benefits from your vote.

                  • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    just feel strongly that people should have the most information possible about how our system works

                    Agreed. But I also think that the only way to change the system is to be the change we wanna see. So I am voting for the candidate I want to win. Regardless of odds. I’m voting for who i want to win, based on policies I believe in. And this year it’s Jill Stein who aligns closest to my values.