reuters.com
www.reuters.com
      • pooperNickel@lemm.ee
        5·
        2 months ago

        You’d stop posting the minute everyone ignored you. Since you know the stakes of this election though, you know that won’t happen.

      • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
        11·
        2 months ago

        When you post articles that use data that is damn near a month out of date. Polls from August 25th? Or is it August 27th? Wasn’t that prior to the debate pounding that Harris gave Trump? On top of that where is this data from? What CAIR has posted at first glance does not include geographic breakdowns, so where did that data actually come from?

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
          19·
          2 months ago

          I didn’t write the Rueters news article. The date of the article shows “September 19, 20243:21 PM MDT.”

          If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it.

          • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
            11·
            2 months ago

            The date of the article is irrelevant, the article clearly shows the poll was made August 25 to August 27th.

            And I’m not going to bitch to Reuters about the audacity you had to post such nonsense data to a politics community.

              • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
                31·
                2 months ago

                And I just told you that I don’t have a problem with Reuters. I totally get that it is not high priority news and it took them a while to put out a report about it.

                I just told you that it’s you I have a problem with.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    91·
    2 months ago

    Jill Stein doesn’t put in the efforts between presidential elections to promote her party or to get her candidates elected in local, state or federal elections.

    She’s not for helping anyone besides herself and a majority of Muslim Americans realize this.

    • blazera@lemmy.worldEnglish
      37·
      2 months ago

      You just get that impression because the media isnt interested in her between elections. She continues having events and talks and doing political work.

        • blazera@lemmy.worldEnglish
          37·
          2 months ago

          You really cant be crusading against a party being elected and then try and complain that theyre not getting elected.

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
            3·
            2 months ago

            Jill Stein doesn’t put in the efforts between presidential elections to promote her party or to get her candidates elected in local, state or federal elections. She’s not for helping anyone besides herself and a majority of Muslim Americans realize this

            This was my original comment, the one you responded to.

            • blazera@lemmy.worldEnglish
              26·
              2 months ago

              Yes, effort is put in. Effort that you and the DNC are fighting against on a daily basis. How much effort gets someone elected for the green party? Can you give me a number of speeches given, emails sent, flyers put up, that guarantees their candidate gets elected?

                • blazera@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  26·
                  2 months ago

                  Nah we’re talking about putting in effort. They can put in all the work in the world but they cant force anyone to vote for them.

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.caEnglish
    43·
    2 months ago

    1.34% of the American population, the third largest religion in the US behind Christianity and Judaism.

    I’m also going to point out that voting based on what’s happening to people who share your religion in a foreign country is a TERRIBLE idea. If you make that your voting priority, it will bite you in the face in other aspects of your life because someone will exploit you for their own ends. The same is pretty much true for any single issue voter.

    We’re all free to be stupid, but it probably won’t end well.

    • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
      1·
      2 months ago

      So I’ve been thinking, if I was in these folks shoes, what should I be doing?

      I think the Uncommitted movement nailed it on the head: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/19/harris-uncommitted-movement-declines-endorse

      tldr - the stupid FPTP system in the US means we effectively are stuck between two candidates, GOP and Dem, and of the two, the GOP one would be much much worse. So without endorsing they still recommend voting for the Dem candidate for President - while also voting down the ballot for candidates who better represent their views (and might be able to make the future President listen or at least rein the President in - e.g. enough Dem House Reps might be able to table a future bill to increase arms sales to Israel).

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.caEnglish
        11·
        2 months ago

        The most useful thing individuals can do to change or enact specific policy is to get involved in party politics, because the party platforms are decided internally and either becoming a party delegate, or working to garner votes from delegates for particular policies actually works.

    • blazera@lemmy.worldEnglish
      23·
      2 months ago

      How about based on whats happening to people that dont share my religion? Because what is happening is so horrific it doesnt matter what group they belong to, it must be stopped.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.caEnglish
        1·
        2 months ago

        When was the last time you posted about the other genocides going on? Do you even know which ones I’m talking about?

        Or are you just following the social context around the Israel-Palestine conflict and ignoring the fact that there are multiple other major genocides occurring right now? One of them has had a few hundred thousand kids forcibly separated from their parents and sent to special boarding schools, the other is at almost a half million deaths, both dwarfing the scale of the Israeli-Palestine conflict by almost an order of magnitude.

        How about them? Where’s the university protests? Where’s the demands for divestment? You haven’t even made a single comment or post about any of them from what I can see.

        Nah, this one is the fad genocide to be all upset about right now.

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
          214·
          2 months ago

          Nope. Every vote for Harris is stealing a vote from third-party candidates who represent real change. By sidelining those voices, you’re indirectly helping Trump win!

          If you really want to avoid a Trump win, supporting a viable alternative outside the two-party system is the only way to push the conversation forward. :)

          • pooperNickel@lemm.ee
            5·
            2 months ago

            Nice try but that’s in no way nearing reality. It is however, intentionally enraging. What a great guy.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    312·
    2 months ago

    They should withhold their vote for the person contributing to getting their family members killed. When Democrats lose again it will be their own doing, again.

    The cult of personality to the point of being willing to overlook genocide is insane

    • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
      1·
      2 months ago

      I think there are two key points to remember here:

      1. The GOP guy would endorse much worse policies for these folks than Harris.

      2. While Harris is too far off, pressure can also be exerted by voting for the right Senators, House Reps, and local/state officials. Unlike the GOP guy, we have a better chance of making Harris listen, if the right folks are below her.

      Ultimately, I respect everyone’s choice in voting and won’t pass judgement on doing so. But either way, I believe that the key remains building up the grassroots, as AOC and Ralph Nader have both stated recently.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        17·
        2 months ago

        This sounds like some of that push him left after the election bullshit we heard from liberals in 2020. The entire US government only responds to the donor class, there is no pushing anyone any direction without money.

        • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
          11·
          1 month ago

          This sounds like some of that push him left after the election … in 2020.

          Nader, you mean? Perhaps.

          The entire US government only responds to the donor class, there is no pushing anyone any direction without money.

          Yeah, was a problem even before Citizens United in 2010 - but that made it a gazillion times worse.

          after the election bullshit we heard from liberals in 2020.

          Uh, what? Citation needed?

          I remember a lot of BS after but it was from the GOP candidate - something about his winning the election and it getting stolen.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        413·
        2 months ago

        They dont understand how election math works, a vote for Harris is taking a vote away from a third party candidate and is giving it to Trump.

        • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
          2·
          2 months ago

          That’s not how any of that works. The only reason people consider 3rd party votes throw aways is because 3rd party absolutely with 100% confidence will not win the federal election right now. America isn’t primed to allow that to happen at this stage and level. They need to take local elections first and build up the movement getting enough backing to make the federal level even close to possible.

          And whether voting for 3rd party is throwing a vote to one of the other two parties comes down to which one the voter would have voted for had a 3rd party not been an option. If they would’ve voted for the democratic candidate, but instead chose to vote for a 3rd party that has 0% chance of winning, then yeah, it hurts the democratic platforms chances. If they would have voted republican, but chose to vote for a 3rd party with 0% chance of winning the it hurts the repiblican platforms chance. Therefore green party votes are considered mostly detrimental to democratic platforms because their voters are more left leaning in nature. Few would vote republican when no 3rd party option presented itself.

          The idea that voting democratic or republican is throwing away a vote from green to their competitor isn’t functional since the party has zero chance of winning, even if the fence sitters joined them. If they were competitive on federal level you would have a point though.

          • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
            18·
            2 months ago

            Why is that not how it works, it seems to be the preferred method when the candidates are rearranged? The whole Stein vote gives it to Trump bullshit.