Lemmy: Bestiverse
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Tony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish ·
edit-2
2 months ago

Why was it hard for the GOP – which controls Congress – to pass its spending bill?

theconversation.com

external-link
message-square
13
fedilink
92
external-link

Why was it hard for the GOP – which controls Congress – to pass its spending bill?

theconversation.com

Tony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish ·
edit-2
2 months ago
message-square
13
fedilink
Without Democratic votes to break a Senate filibuster, the GOP would not have been able to pass its stopgap spending bill and avert a government shutdown.

Actual vote: https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00133.htm

Schumer voted “no” on the bill itself, but “yes” to have a vote on the vote. See below.

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 months ago

    TL;DR: the filibuster. The thing the Democrats say they can’t abolish because they need it to block the Republican agenda. Even though they just refused to use it to block a Republican agenda.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Was it hard, though? They had staunch allies across the aisle.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Cuck Schumer should just become a fucking Republican at this point.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Chuck Schumer should just fucking retire.

    • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      When the GOP was the minority, spending bills was their cheat code to winning political points. McConnell did it all the time.

  • echo@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It wasn’t. It was strictly performative. The majority of the Democrats are aligned with the Republicans and so a super-majority supports Trump. Why? Because they’re all bought and paid for by the same billionaires.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The same megadonors of both parties

  • robador51@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Did I read somewhere it needed 60% majority?

    (Edit) I did. Explained here: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-is-a-simple-majority-usually-not-enough-to-pass-a-bill-in-the-senate/

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The Senate has some weird rules. The vote to approve the bill itself only needed a simple majority. But in order to hold that vote, you first need to hold a different vote to declare that everyone is done talking, and they should just get on with the actual vote already. That vote is what needed 60/100.

      The actual vote ended up 54/46, with 2 Democrats voting for it and Rand Paul voting against it (I guess he really doesn’t like these “kick-the-can” resolutions)

      Looks like this is the roll call from the first vote (cloture) which needed 60: https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00128.htm

      And this is the actual vote: https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00133.htm

      Note that Schumer voted “no” on the actual bill, but “yes” on the vote to have a vote.

      • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        Note that Schumer voted “no” on the actual bill, but “yes” on the vote to have a vote.

        That’s one hell of a weasel move.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          He wanted an excuse to vote yes,

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      What’s even more annoying is that the Senate rule enabling the filibuster can be gotten rid of with a simple majority (not 60%) vote.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The reason why it was hard is it wasn’t just a CR…

    Instead of appropriating funds to specific places, it’s was like 2-3 big piles trump can do with at will.

    It’s why a few hours after it passed he closed 7 agencies via EO

    Edit:

    Apparently he still hasn’t signed the CR…

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.58K users / day
  • 7.61K users / week
  • 13.5K users / month
  • 28.1K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 23.4K subscribers
  • 11.9K Posts
  • 225K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org