• ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    I am relating fursuits to BDSM leather, gimp suits, pup play gear, latex, etc, yes. Sports attire clearly doesn’t fit this category, save maybe the cheerleaders of course I suppose. I was talking about fursuits in public from the get go, in the quote you quoted me in fact. You brought up porn, that’s why I responded about porn in public. Seems maybe you’re one of those people who don’t bother reading what they’re responding to?

    How eat with suit on? Why not just not wear the suit in public? At least the gimp while being similarly inappropriate in public despite your protests can unzip the mouth, that just seems like added difficulty to me.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Fursuits are not revealing or sexy and the people in them are not putting them on only in cases they want to have sex. It’s not connected like that.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      that’s like relating halloween costumes to BDSM gear. Or like i said, sports jerseys.

      That was literally the point lmao.

      You brought up porn

      yes. for an irrelevant reason

      that’s why I responded about porn in public.

      fursuits are not porn, public indecency is not porn, and fursuits are not public indecency.

      How eat with suit on?

      take off the head.

      Why not just not wear the suit in public?

      they don’t? Like most of the time? Whenever you see a furry in public chances are, there’s a fur con, if not, they’re probably not causing problems.

      At least the gimp while being similarly inappropriate in public despite your protests can unzip the mouth, that just seems like added difficulty to me.

      you have to be trolling