• VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I bet none of these “apolitical” organisations would act if someone displayed a Ukrainian flag and I bet none of them would claim it was potentially sensitive and offensive to Russians.

    Supporting Ukraine = nonpolitical

    Supporting Palestine = political

    Mega double standards when it comes to the two conflicts.

    (I am against the Russian invasion, just in case it seems otherwise)

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Supporting Ukraine = nonpolitical

      Supporting Palestine = political

      Now ask these people about Iran, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan. Let’s see whether their classification is really based on religion. :-\

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      All flags are inherrently political. A flag is the ultimate symbol for nationalism. Usually you shouldn’t display them in any context, especially in a job that makes you face people from different backgrounds, ethnicities or nations.

      So yeah, I’d tell someone to take off the Ukraine background too, not for the “someone might be offended” reason

    • cygnosis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ukrainian flag - not political. Russian flag - political.

      Israeli flag - not political. Palestinian flag - political.

      I think that’s the point of the lawsuit. You can’t claim you’re “completely apolitical and non-biased” when you actually support one side of a conflict and punish your employees who support the other side.