Elon Musk has said an Axios report that the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had concluded there was no evidence of a Jeffrey Epstein client list was the “final straw”.

The report also said the agencies had concluded there was no credible evidence the disgraced financier and pedophile blackmailed high-profile and prominent individuals, and confirmed that surveillance footage showed Epstein had killed himself in prison.

“So… umm… then what is Ghislaine Maxwell in prison for?” Musk posted to his X platform, referring to Epstein’s former girlfriend and associate who procured underage girls for him to abuse.

  • Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If you refer to them as property which is the implication yes it works.

    Though thank you professor weird guy. Now tell me how it changes anything at all or what exactly your point is?

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        My point is you’re a tedious pedant. What does your modification actually change in my point? Nothing either way? Neat, thanks professor.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          My modification makes it grammatically correct English. That makes it easier for people to read. It’s basic English.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            Does it change the point? No?

            Then you’re solely being a tedious pedant looking for a win. Go away or at the very least don’t bother me Mrs. Foster.

            Ed: ps.

            My modification makes it grammatically correct English.

            It might in your eyes but it also changes the point of the sentence, you’re removing context not adding any.

            That makes it easier for people to read.

            What does?

            It’s basic English.

            That is not in fact a complete sentence, I do so enjoy the hypocrisy though.

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Does what change what point? See, your inability to articulate your thoughts in English is the whole issue here. I’m not just looking for a win, I have a win, whereas you have a loss. But, my win isn’t just important for my sake. It’s important because when people use English correctly, it makes it easier for other people to read.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                The point of the comment you are attempting to “correct” while ignoring the writers intent.

                Not at all, a correction that changes intent isn’t a correction it’s a modification and an incorrect one at that.

                If you had kept the intent and not argued that I don’t know my own intent you may have had a point.

                And again, the high horsing while you’re actively kicking your own ass is priceless.

                Try again bud, hypocrisy is fun though.

                • merc@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  while ignoring the writers intent

                  You need to use an apostrophe when using a possessive. It’s basic English.