Furries are humanoid creatures with animal appearances and human or near human intelligence, they’re generally not considered zoophilic because they are mostly humanoid and can consent
I can’t tell if you’re joking, this is something I would say if I were trolling. Just in case you’re serious:
If they have human authors they are created with EXPLICIT consent. That’s how fiction works xD
That’s like condemning all fiction literature because the people in the stories were forced into horrible situations for the sake of the plot.
Would it be more creative knowing the origin?
It’s my two dogs’ names combined. Loki and Kona. But I also misspelled it and the KOLA should have been a KOLO. KOloNAki.
It’s definitely fun to know that.
For me creative would be more like when something makes me giggle but only after reading it twice.
That’s worrying for someone who was on yiffit
Only if you’re a weirdo who incorrectly assumes all furries are zoophiles.
I thought yiff referred to the zoophile furries?
It is just a shorthand for furry porn/slang for having sex in general.
Isn’t that zoophilia?
Furries are humanoid creatures with animal appearances and human or near human intelligence, they’re generally not considered zoophilic because they are mostly humanoid and can consent
But furries cannot consent without being forced to by their human authors, therefore they cannot consent.
I can’t tell if you’re joking, this is something I would say if I were trolling. Just in case you’re serious: If they have human authors they are created with EXPLICIT consent. That’s how fiction works xD That’s like condemning all fiction literature because the people in the stories were forced into horrible situations for the sake of the plot.