• illusionist@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    My guess:

    • More personalized ads
    • less customization
    • fewer functionality
    • more pay for the CEO
    • development behind closed doors like AOSP
    • own search engine
    • infeeeee@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I also hope they add some AI thing. OMG I need more AI things in my webbrowser. It doesn’t matter what it does, but it has to have this icon: ✨, that’s the important

        • infeeeee@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          I know, but one AI is not AI enough! I need one at the address bar, so I can write there my prompt directly. I need one to help sort my tab groups. One which automatically changes my settings, etc. The possibilities are endless, we have to add more ai features until we eliminated all legacy, distracting, non ai buttons

          • Ferk@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            All you need is the promptbar. No need to waste resources rendering a bloated page. Have the AI summarize the contents in one sentence and then speak it out loud so I don’t have to read.

    • unalivejoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      own search engine

      It’s going backwards. You’re supposed to make a search engine first, then create a web browser.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I see a web browser like a TV screen. An I need it to do is display the internet with nothing in the way. Any attempt to add built-in “smart” features to it will make it worse. If I want something else added to it, I’ll plug it in myself.

    • James R Kirk@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Man I am the complete opposite. I need my browser to display the Web with tons and tons of tweaks and adjustments and filters in place to make it actually readable for me. Rawdogging the Web in 2025 is wild.

      • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        That’s fine. Those are the plugins you chose to install for your particular tastes and these are very important options to have available to the user should he choose to use them. That’s not what I meant by “smart” features.

        What I don’t want is my browser with built-in modern equivalents of Bonzi Buddy that you can’t remove.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Integrate DownThemAll, without fucking up existing installations of DownThemAll. Like how you uninstalled and blocked the Pocket plugin.

    Allow blob:// videos to be saved normally. It’s just a file. I’m looking at it. Move it from memory to the hard drive.

    Tab Mix Plus needs to be feasible again, with multi-row tabs that aren’t a hundred pixels wide. I want a grid of favicons. I don’t give one solitary shit how anyone else feels about that desire.

    Aggressively commit to supporting adblockers. Browsers obey the user. Servers can send documents, and we will do with them as we please.

    • Ferk@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Allow blob:// videos to be saved normally. It’s just a file. I’m looking at it. Move it from memory to the hard drive.

      True. Although in many cases this is indicative of a stream (not really a traditional file for the browser), but at the very least, even in the (rare?) cases that there isn’t cached content already, it should theoretically be possible to start saving the video the moment you press on the save button…

      Already the “picture-in-picture” mode Firefox offers is a step in the right direction, imho. It allows the browser to take over control of the playback, which is something some places try to forbid.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anywhere so long as they don’t try to kill adblockers

    Everything else the forks can work around. What’s important is they don’t give into manifest v3/WEI and become complicit in the death of adblockers.

  • deur@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    In the trash along with chromium the moment servo is even slightly usable on all the sites I use.

    • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same but with LadyBird. Once its available, a lot of nerds will definitely advocate for its usage if its good.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I doubt it’ll be usable on most websites when they release their first version. It might take decades to support current web standards…