• drail@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Everything should just be in eV. Particle physics natural units are the best.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Fun fact: Seconds are called seconds because the first breakdown of an hour is the minute, and the second breakdown is the second. Don’t ask me the obvious question(s) because I don’t know.

    • f314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      If by obvious question you mean “why is it called a minute,” that is because “minute” means “small.” So you have the first minute (small) part and the second minute part of the hour.

      • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        My brother, that explanation is not nearly dumbed down enough and as with most math wiki is useless for eli5 stuff.

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I think a lot of people understand the concept of light-seconds, which can measure distance in seconds.

          Allow me to introduce the gravity-second. 1 gravity-second of mass-energy is enough mass-energy to have a Schwarzchild radius of 2 light-seconds.

            • davidgro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Size of a black hole.

              Certain mass = certain distance

              Distance = seconds

              Therefore mass = seconds

              • uis@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 days ago

                Then I don’t even want to be in same solar system with millisecond heavy object.

                • davidgro@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  You most certainly don’t, that’s a radius of about 300km (186 miles) and a mass of 101 suns.

                  Even if you meant microsecond, that’s 1/10 of the sun, and would be very disruptive.

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Mass in seconds? How? I get mass in Joules, but seconds?

    • Eiri@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      There are two possibilities I can think of:

      • Orbit duration can be used to calculate mass
      • The diameter of a star or the parallax distance on the sky (in arcseconds) can also be used to evaluate mass
        • Eiri@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          I thought stars of similar masses were also of similar sizes. They’re not?

          • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            I’m no astrologer but from what I’ve learned, we also need to look at the color to glassify stars into categories. It varies a bit though in each category so it’s a blunt tool.

            Then there are other objects like gas clouds and even galaxies. For those, we have no idea of the density distribution, so radial size gives us even less info.