HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoWhat number is supposed to be here?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1117arrow-down16
arrow-up1111arrow-down1imageWhat number is supposed to be here?lemmy.worldHonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 hours agoThe top left and bottom right dots should line up entirely but it’s a misprint so I don’t think an eight can be discounted entirely: (I used a rectangle to overlay to show the alignment against a known straight line)
minus-squareZwuzelmaus@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 minutes ago but it’s a misprint so I don’t think OK so we need to align assumptions :-) I am going with the assumption that an unknown amount is missing, but these dots that we can see are all in their correct places. If you want to assume that the dots that we can see may be wrong, then I won’t discuss your conclusions any further.
The top left and bottom right dots should line up entirely but it’s a misprint so I don’t think an eight can be discounted entirely:
(I used a rectangle to overlay to show the alignment against a known straight line)
OK so we need to align assumptions :-)
I am going with the assumption that an unknown amount is missing, but these dots that we can see are all in their correct places.
If you want to assume that the dots that we can see may be wrong, then I won’t discuss your conclusions any further.