If I need this level of “real” Windows where it’s the whole operating system running virtualized, I’d feel more comfortable just running a virtual machine.
You should talk to Windows users, then, because… you know, WSL is a thing.
I would like to not have a use case, but… I kinda do. What I don’t have is a solution to that use case, so I just dual boot. Because both a VM and a VM-but-it-puts-the-window-you-want-directly-on-your-desktop are not good enough for the types of applications that are not working or unsupported.
I have a use case too, but it comes down to wine and VM increasing hardware latency which I need as close to 0ms as possible. Even 20ms is too much. Fortunately these situations are minimal but it’s still annoying.
Struggling to see the use-case.
If I need this level of “real” Windows where it’s the whole operating system running virtualized, I’d feel more comfortable just running a virtual machine.
I mean… really?
You should talk to Windows users, then, because… you know, WSL is a thing.
I would like to not have a use case, but… I kinda do. What I don’t have is a solution to that use case, so I just dual boot. Because both a VM and a VM-but-it-puts-the-window-you-want-directly-on-your-desktop are not good enough for the types of applications that are not working or unsupported.
I have a use case too, but it comes down to wine and VM increasing hardware latency which I need as close to 0ms as possible. Even 20ms is too much. Fortunately these situations are minimal but it’s still annoying.
Yeah i like having a nice clear barrier between my native and virtual systems.