I fail to see how any of that is relevant to an upper age limits in congress.
Sorry, that’s an entirely separate conversation.
Again, the only reason I put it there is because it’s already an accepted age for retirement. That’s it. Which simplifies things by preempting the whole debate about where to put it.
Because that debate derails the conversation- every damn time. Currently, in point of fact… by you.
So? What’s your point?
I fail to see how any of that is relevant to an upper age limits in congress.
Sorry, that’s an entirely separate conversation.
Again, the only reason I put it there is because it’s already an accepted age for retirement. That’s it. Which simplifies things by preempting the whole debate about where to put it.
Because that debate derails the conversation- every damn time. Currently, in point of fact… by you.
Not if you conceded that 60 would be better than 65