• CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “if we stopped testing we’d have less cases”

    This is just to hide how badly things are going.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m conflicted on this one because companies should be transparent, but the current quarterly requirements drive incredibly short sighted decisions aimed exclusively at pumping up the share price every 3 months.

    Publicly traded companies don’t plan more than like 3 years ahead because of this pressure.

    Dodge v Ford, eBay v Newmark, probably lots of other court decisions, all make share price the only thing that matters to a Board of Directors. Nothing about the workers. Nothing about the community. Nothing about the nation…

    Would this help? Not sure. But it would make the 3 month window less dominant.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      Gonna go out on a limb and say capitalism won’t fix itself if it suddenly looked further ahead. Probably the opposite.

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is the next step in hiding that you are killing the economy because of your grifting.

  • Poayjay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If companies stop reporting quarterly, then all of the bad news is going to come all at once at the end of the of most companies fiscal year in the fall. Since it’s every industry, the entire market will surge or sink every fall. If people had insider knowledge, well that’s a yearly wealth transfer from your 401k to the 1%.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Next up will be “get rid of annual reporting”. They’ll change it to be “every 4 years, the first Tuesday after the presidential election”.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m just thinking that Taco wants it to be timed right after things, like, oh, say, midterm elections.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If companies stop reporting quarterly, then all of the bad news is going to come all at once at the end of the of most companies fiscal year in the fall.

      Also, it isn’t as though they won’t have internal reports. And given the deplorable state of the SEC, I have to assume this would lead to some wild insider trading in between annual releases.

      If people had insider knowledge, well that’s a yearly wealth transfer from your 401k to the 1%.

      It’s arguably worse than that. People passing around unregulated reports under the table can still lie to one another with abandon. So the black market for inside info is ripe for fraud and scams which can’t even be prosecuted normally, because its not information anyone has to report out to a public commission.

      If I want to come in and release the “Double Super Secret Real Microsoft Numbers” and spread it around, I can effectively manipulate the price of the stock based on how many people I can dupe into believing my phony figures.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Alternatively, global investors will start to shun the US, because US companies don’t have to be as transparent anymore. Then there is a giant sucking sound of capital out of US markets, and the stock market and dollar tanks.

      You would think that a President would want to avoid this, but most of his wealth is now in crypto, and if the dollar tanks his crypto is worth more dollars.

      He is so transparently out for his own gain, and those of his Crypto Broligarch friends, over what is best for the country as a whole.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        An awful lot of crypto seems to track along with the American stock market. Maybe not an exact mirror, but if watch big drops/gains in S&P, you’ll usually see big drops/gains in something like BTC, anyway.

        Not sure about Taco’s shitcoins, though.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No, but if the dollar tanks then crypto arbitrage bots will make sure the value of the dollar vs. crypto tanks along with it. People invested in crypto (but who live in dollars) get a big win at the expense of everyone else.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You would think that would happen but I doubt it at this point.

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I feel like this is one of those rare cases where Trump and I agree on something, but it’s still ultimately for completely different reasons. I suspect not having to report quarterly will make it easier for his companies to cook the books.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No, this is a horrible idea through and through. Delayed reporting only benefits those with insider information. It isn’t going to change the fundamental problem of so many companies existing solely to enrich investors nor is it going to change all of the bullshit accounting “tricks” that boil down to “fire your staff and say you did more with less”

    • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 hours ago

      May I inquire how this could be a good thing? I feel like it could exacerbate problems, but I’m not well versed enough in macroeconomics to make an accurate assessment.

      • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Quarterly reporting makes company leadership focus on short term gains over the long term health of the company, leading to frequent layoffs, selloffs and other actions that hurt both the employees and the economy as a whole.

        • Dagnet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 hours ago

          but then you would need to have reports once every 5 years to actually see much change in their strategies.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          We are talking about when they are required to release earnings not the only time they can. I’m pretty sure that lengthening the time wouldn’t really change anything as far as short term profit gain is concerned.

          Like I doubt the quarterly earnings calls would go away, shareholders wouldn’t want to go a whole year without hearing from the company, they would just be a lot more lies and fluff.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I assume it is because they draw attention to companies struggling. Easier for him to deflect once a year than it is 4 times a year. If people don’t know what to expect they can blindly throw money into companies all year and not realize they haven’t hit projections in 9 months.

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This was my first half sec thought, too, but it would actually be pretty bad. A lot more economic ticket would be happening behind closed doors for months before it would ever have to be released to the public. Insider trading would increase.

      And it wouldn’t actually change the short term incentives that drive CEOs to make short term decisions that hurt the long term.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If you believe the right-libertarians, then capitalism works great when everyone has good information, and everyone can process that information correctly and respond accordingly.

    How is dropping quarterly reporting going to help that? You’re not even satisfying the conditions for the most pro-capitalist people on the planet.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m assuming that’s what Taco really wants.

      Then he gets his loyalist bootlicks to keep telling everyone how wonderful everything is (and if it isn’t, it’s because we are victims of the “worst” economy ever and we have to “dig out of it”, lol, don’t look into it yourself what the numbers were under Biden, just trust us, it was terrible…) because there won’t be any reliable jobs numbers either…