• Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    RTFM comments are probably mostly about using the terminal, which is a good thing, since man pages explain most of the things pretty good.

    • HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      The only issue with man pages is that it often doesn’t cover common use cases. I know info pages often have that kind of information, but it’s hit or miss it they exist.

      • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Would be nice if more man pages were like the OpenBSD ones, since they actually do that pretty consistently, in my experience. Probably what I would go with if I needed to install something on a computer I would be locked up with somehow, without internet access.

        Unfortunately, as I recall, there are occasional differences in how their version of commands work, versus the same command in Linux. For one example, look at the difference in the man pages for ifconfig between Arch Linux and OpenBSD.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Indeed, only cases I see RTFM are stuff such as: how do I use the cut command to get columns 3 and 5 in a semicolon divided document? And even then there’s generally someone explaining.

      Now, regarding the quality of man pages… In maby cases it feels they were written in the 80s by someone who had to ship them as soon as possible and nobody ever improved them. Some commands are very well explained with examples and such, some have the options clearly explained, many just have the list of options without clarifying what the option is for.