The Supreme Court is about to run out of money, and federal courts across the country are expected to run out by early next week because of the government shutdown.

The nation’s top court “expects to run out of funding on October 18,” Patricia McCabe, Supreme Court public information officer, told The Hill.

“As a result, the Supreme Court Building will be closed to the public until further notice. The Building will remain open for official business,” McCabe continued.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    No, actually, only Congress can remove a SCOTUS judge with a senate majority of 67 and a simple house majority.

    But if they did get laid off or if they died then they would no longer qualify for backpay under current Trump admin. (Courts might challenge this).

    Unfortunately SCOTUS judge appointments can no longer be fillibustered, AFAIK, so tbey could be replaced very easily even without the DNC.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      DNC would need to control a chamber of congress and leadership would need a spine to do what McConnell did right back to them. No filibuster just never bring the vote up but since Rs have a trifecta it doesn’t matter.

      • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        a chamber of congress

        The senate*. The house is not involved in confirmation of presidential appointments. Due to the staggered elections in the senate, the democrats cannot realistically regain control of the senate until January 3, 2029, since its a 53-47 majority right now, and amongst the seats up for election in 2026, I only realistically see Maine getting flipped, the other red seats are highly unlikely to get flipped. A total of 4 flipped seats are needed to block confirmations.

        Map of which the seats up for election and color means the party of incumbent, greyed out states have no senators up for reelection (excluding the 2 special election in deep red states, which would never be blue anyways):

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, idk my info bubble doesn’t give me a great feel for other places but so long as fair elections happen I’ve still got hope right now (though that varies…). Republicans are easily (and rightfully) blamed for a lot of stuff that is making life worse/harder for average Americans right now. Even many deep red states did have high level Democrat representation not too long ago, the surge in progressive representation and voices in my locale and state gives me some belief we can still eke out some positive progress.