fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agoeel buttsmander.xyzimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1607arrow-down11
arrow-up1606arrow-down1imageeel buttsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·1 day agoyes they do, but not as a useful, well defined category in biology.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·24 hours agoit’s a morphological category, not cladistic. Like how “tree” is any plant with a thick robust trunk and branchy crown.
And fish don’t even exist.
yes they do, but not as a useful, well defined category in biology.
it’s a morphological category, not cladistic.
Like how “tree” is any plant with a thick robust trunk and branchy crown.