Zohran Mamdani’s campaign represented a struggle for basic dignity and an affirmation of democratic potential. It was ceaselessly denounced by political and media elites from across the spectrum as something sinister, violent, and dangerous.

Zohran Mamdani’s campaign represented a struggle for basic dignity and an affirmation of democratic potential. It was ceaselessly denounced by political and media elites from across the spectrum as something sinister, violent, and dangerous.

  • piefood@feddit.onlineEnglish
    41·
    3 days ago

    Who is talking about the banks? WTF are you on about?

    The vast majority, everyone minus a rounding error, endorsed Mamdani and were excited by his victory in the DNC.

    I think you missed this part again:

    “They begrudgingly supported him once it became clear that he was going to win. They never wanted to support him, they are only doing it to save face.”

    It’s almost like you don’t like engaging with data that doesn’t fit your narrative. Weird, I wonder where I heard that before.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      11·
      3 days ago

      I’m a consequentialist, their reasons for supporting progress are meaningless in the face of progress.

      • piefood@feddit.onlineEnglish
        1·
        17 hours ago

        No, your a partisan hack. You ignore data that makes your team look bad, and spin data to make them look good.