• Delta_V@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Its Orwellian double-speak. It implements restrictions on how people in Montana are allowed to use their personal property (computers) where no restrictions existed before.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I just read the bill. Where are you seeing restrictions? I’m reading it as restrictions are banned unless there is compelling reason for the government to enact such restrictions. That’s all well enough defined.

      Only negative thing I’m seeing is this seems to make banning new DCs a lot tougher.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Tell me you haven’t read the bill without telling me you haven’t read the bill.

      It absolutely does not place restrictions on the use of personal property. It does the exact opposite.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s a whopping 6 pages and mostly double-spaced and more white space. And lemmy upvotes these cynical comments without a shred of investigation.

        I’m reading it as making data centers harder to block, now I’m not so sure. Your take?

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          The bill explicitly states that data centers being a public nuisance is a “Compelling government interest,” so I don’t think it’s geared towards protecting data centers.

          taking actions that prevent or abate common law nuisances created by physical datacenter infrastructure.

          Edit: there is one major issue with the bill; it still keeps the door open for age verification.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Don’t listen to them; they’re full of shit. The bill restricts the government from restricting use of private compute resources unless they can prove they don’t have a less restrictive way of addressing a legitimate problem.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          But you don’t understand, we all hate AI so much that this must be evil somehow.

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Which is funny because the bill explicitly states that deepfakes and data centers are things the government can restrict.