Younger men threw their support behind Donald Trump in 2024 after favoring Biden in 2020

The United States is still not ready for a female president after more than a century of unsuccessful campaigns for the White House, according to former First Lady Michelle Obama.

“As we saw in this past election, sadly, we ain’t ready,” Obama said earlier this month in a live conversation with actor Tracee Ellis Ross that was published Friday.

“That’s why I’m like, don’t even look at me about running, because you all are lying,” she said. “You’re not ready for a woman. You are not. So don’t waste my time.”

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I mean, she’s right.

    I don’t care if Hillary won the popular vote. That’s not how presidential elections in our country work. You can stop talking about it, because it’s a moot point.

    We’ve run a woman twice now and lost twice. This country is a racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and xenophobic trashcan.

    Get the hint. Play the game to win.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I mean, she’s right.

      She’s not. She’s throwing out an easy answer to a very complex question. “Two ladies ran for President and lost? I guess ladies can’t win the presidency.”

      But you could play this game with literally any presidential campaign and be wrong.

      This country is a racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and xenophobic trashcan.

      Obama beating Hillary in the primary in 2008 proves that our country hates women more than black people. And when he beat both McCain in 2008 and Romney in 2012, it allowed us to conclude our country hates Veterans and Mormons.

      Then Trump beat Hillary, proving the country hates women again (but not before Trump’s primary win proved it hates Latinos, Black People, People Still on Their First Wife, and Ohioans). Then Biden beat Trump, proving the country hates Septuagenarians. Then Trump beat Harris, proving you need to be a billionaire before you’ll be seriously considered for the White House.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        “Two ladies ran for President and lost? I guess ladies can’t win the presidency.”

        And all but once when a woman was the VP on the ticket, the ticket lost. The only time when there was a woman on the ticket and the ticket was successful was after the first Trump term.

        There’s never been a woman that won any presidential primary (other than Hillary if you count that)

        It’s what /u/DarkFuture said; the US is a racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and xenophobic trashcan. It always has been. This was the case back when America was more progressive; it’s certainly the case today.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          And all but once

          A full three time, total. Twenty four years between the first two of them.

          There’s never been a woman that won any presidential primary (other than Hillary if you count that)

          How do you not? But in between Geraldine Fererra and Hillary Clinton we added 20 women senators and six governors.

          Politics is a numbers game. You have to run before you can win. And I’ve seen very little evidence to suggest women do worse than men on average. By the number, they run at parity with their male colleagues. You simply have fewer candidates.

          • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            A full three time, total. Twenty four years between the first two of them.

            Why do you think that is? Might it be that strategists are reading the room (the country)? Nah, it couldn’t be…

            How do you not?

            Is that a serious question? Are we going to ignore the DNC shenanigans around Hillary / Bernie?

            I’ve seen very little evidence to suggest women do worse than men on average

            I guess we can ignore each of the instances where there was a woman on the POTUS / VPOTUS ticket. Got it.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Why do you think that is?

              Because men had a 120 year head start at electoral politics. More time, more opportunities, more generations of fathers training their sons to be politicians than mothers training their daughters.

              Are we going to ignore the DNC shenanigans around Hillary / Bernie?

              Hillary out-muscled Bernie the old fashioned way. You’d have an easier time arguing Obama pulled the rug out from under Hillary (re: Michigan). At least that was a close race.

              I guess we can ignore each of the instances where there was a woman on the POTUS / VPOTUS ticket

              You’re ignoring all the instances where there wasn’t. You think LBJ would have lost to Goldwater if Humphrey had tits? Or that Reagan needed Bush’s dick to crush Mondale by 20 points? Do you think Obama needed to be a man to win, when he was already playing with the biggest handicap in national politics?

              Put your name on the ballot and, statically speaking, your gender simply does not matter.

              • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                You should read more about Political Science, you’d understand a lot more and you wouldn’t have to pull made up numbers from your ass.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The two female candidates who lost were WILDLY more qualified than felon rapist pedophile Donald Trump.

        If that doesn’t tell you that this country isn’t ready for a female president, then you are actively refusing to acknowledge objective reality and I can only presume you have a fetish for losing.

        Ready to gamble what’s left of our democracy?

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The two female candidates who lost were WILDLY more qualified

          According to whom? You’re trying to apply an objective rubric to a purely subjective selection process and mistaking the job of President for job of Running For President.

          That’s long before you get into Harris’s “qualifications” as a party flak riding the coat tails of her superiors. Let’s not forget that Harris has never won a national primary. She couldn’t even win her home state the one time she put her toe in the water in '20. She was unqualified for President for the same reason Bernie Sanders and Marco Rubio and Michael Bloomberg were unqualified. Because they were losers.

          Ready to gamble what’s left of our democracy?

          I will put all my chips on a Zohran Mamdani or Rashida Talib before I bet a bent penny on the next Pete Buttigieg or Beto O’Rourke.

          We need winners, not nepo hires, running the party going forward.

    • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      If you want votes. You appeal to voters.

      Not people who only care about politics once every four years, to systematically go through everything you’ve done for 30 years, to see if your the right flavour of obscure political ideology.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is a stupid take. Give the people a viable candidate that doesn’t thank Dick Satan Chaney for his service and cheerfully announces the desire for the “most lethal military” when the voting base is expressing discontent with the governments support for an active genocide, and she’ll win.

      People didn’t reject KH because she was a woman, they rejected her “centrist” campaign that was to the right of GWB’s on several key issues. People didn’t reject Hilary because she was a woman, they rejected her being forced on them instead of Bernie.

      And both of them had the same attitude, that voters owe them their votes, simply because they’re not Trump. People didn’t reject women, then rejected the DNC.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Give the people a viable candidate

        Both female candidates who lost were INSANELY more qualified than felon, rapist, pedophile Donald Trump.

        Still lost.

        Stop ignoring the reality of what America is.

        Don’t gamble with what’s left of our democracy.

        • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Both female candidates who lost were INSANELY more qualified than felon, rapist, pedophile Donald Trump.

          Qualifications aren’t how presidential elections in our country are won. You can stop talking about it, because it’s a moot point.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            7 hours ago

            You realize that no matter what you say, running a female for president is a gamble.

            You are openly admitting you are willing to gamble what’s left of our democracy at a critical juncture in American history.

            Not very bright.

            • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You realize that no matter what you say, running a female for president is a gamble.

              Running anyone is a gamble, there are no guaranteed wins.

              You are openly admitting you are willing to gamble what’s left of our democracy at a critical juncture in American history.

              I said no such thing, you don’t even know my opinion. Arguing with someone in your head is certainly very bright though, no notes.

              • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Running anyone is a gamble

                The fact that you believe any candidate is an equal gamble indicates you are not taking this conversation seriously.

                I can’t take someone seriously that tries to equalize all things. That is not reality and you are not living in it.

                It is less of a gamble to run a white male and you fucking know it. I could care less for your contrarianism.

                Any unnecessary gamble while literal fascists are trying to end our democracy is a fucking disgrace and anyone engaging in such a gamble is a fool.

                • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  The fact that you believe any candidate is an equal gamble

                  Stopped reading, didn’t say that. Have a good day, or don’t, whatever.

      • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        You people really need to make up your mind and pick a lane. Either she didn’t win because you all protested her centrist views, or your lack of support didn’t make a difference.

        But watching you flip flop the outcome based on the discussion is getting sad.

      • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You people really need to make up your mind and pick a lane. Either she didn’t win because you all protested her centrist views, or it didn’t matter because she would have lost anyway.

        But watching you flip flop the outcome based on the discussion is getting sad.

        • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You’re absolutely right, but 2 things can be true at once. She was kinda forced into being the candidate, while also being a bad candidate.

          But ffs! 1/3 of this country voted FOR “I got concepts of a plan”! Being funded by Peter Thiel who openly said he is hostile to the state. Republicans are literally anti American. Sorry for the rant, I’m just incredibly disappointed in my country.