• JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Thanks.

      Iranian law stipulates that 85 percent of domestic food be produced locally, Morad Kaviani, professor of geography and hydropolitics at Iran’s Kharazmi University, told state television last week.

      However, he added, Iran does not have the water and soil capacities, and nearly 30 percent of agricultural produce is wasted due to a lack of infrastructure, outdated irrigation practices and misguided crop selection.

      Sounds like one of the biggest root disasters, eh?

      So, this situation may only slightly be related to AGCC, but it does seem ominous in painting a certain picture of the future. I wonder if and when Russia and China step in, here…

      • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Protip; first time you use an acronym, parse it, and then you can continue referring to it with the abbreviation.

        ROFL (rolling on the floor laughing) as an example could be used to denote something that was, to the receiver, funnier than LOL (laughing out loud)

          • Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Since we’re being sticklers here, the correct term would be Anthropogenic, as in comes from humans, anthropomorphic would be global climate change with human appearance or qualities.

            • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Er, well… it’s now year 2025, AGCC has been scientifically documented and publicly talked about for decades, and is now arguably the biggest existential threat to humanity?

              You know… as seen in increasingly dangerous storm systems year after year, rising global temps year after year, more wildfires, more droughts, rising ocean acidification, rising difficulty growing crops, the holocene extinction accelerating… things like that? All are directly impacted by AGCC, to name a few.

              Getting harder and harder to live under a rock, tell you hwat.

              • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 hours ago

                I’m not questioning how real anthropogenic global climate change is. I’m questioning your decision of using just the initials assuming everyone understand automatically.

                When I googled “AGCC meaning” the suggestions were:

                AGenesis of the Corpus Callosum
                Alderney Gambling Control Commission
                Arab Gulf Cooperation Council
                Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce Action for a Global Climate Community
                Agencia Comercial Spirits ltd (AGCC)

                • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  I didn’t assume. People are going to understand and misunderstand terms no matter what acronym or definition is used, like CC or GCC. Or they’ll deny, get it twisted, whatever. Or ask a curious followup, as you did.

                  When I googled “AGCC meaning” the suggestions were:

                  Well, context is king. If you asked what it meant within that sentence, then it might be able to narrow things down better. We all do this all the time, of course.

              • Ardyssian@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Not OP - I’ve been exposed to Climate Change news to the point of possible depression but I’ve never seen the concept referred to as AGCC before too

                • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  One way that serves a purpose is in making it clear that this isn’t just some natural variance going on, for example in taking on the hand-wavers who like to say ‘oh, it all goes in cycles; nothing to worry about!’

                  So GCC sometimes gets appended with an “A” for “anthropomorphic” to make it crystal clear that (just like the Holocene Extinction) it’s largely (or wholly) man-made. Personally I tend to fluctuate between terms, mainly based on recency bias and just whatever my naked ape brain happens to settle on. :P

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        So US sanctions and hostility basically caused the water crisis because they’re forced to maintain food security by growing it at home… In essentially a desert

        • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Eh, reading the first article, it sounds like it was even more than that, as in: too much middle-management involved in making key water decisions, too much zeal post-revolution in building new dams, too much waffling and inadequate resoluteness at the leadership levels across several decades.

          In other words, the sanctions were no doubt a major blow, but the real issue seems to be how Iran responded to the blow. Plus a bunch of other stuff on top that didn’t help.

          Meanwhile, something I have no idea about is whether Iran’s regional allies, plus China & Russia, could have used trade and such to help offset the sanctions in the first place…?

          • blarghly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Meanwhile, something I have no idea about is whether Iran’s regional allies, plus China & Russia, could have used trade and such to help offset the sanctions in the first place…?

            They could almost certainly offset it enormously. Rice and beans shipped in from China are unlikely to cost much more than those from the US.

            My bet is that “85% domestic production” threshold is less a result of sanctions, and more either (a) self-imposed isolationism, or (b) protectionist policies designed to empower one or other political faction in the country.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Iran has open trade relations with China, Russia, and Turkey, which all have significant agricultural output. It also does quite a bit of trade with Europe despite sanctions. It does not have to artificially limit itself to importing only 15% of its food, especially given that irrigation is contributing to an unsustainable water crisis.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Note that just because they have open trade relations with a state doesn’t mean they can import whatever they want. It’s a Cuba situation; US secondary sanctions target businesses and they’re harsh. Water mismanagement is obviously a major cause here, but don’t underestimate the effect of Western sanctions on smaller countries.