• BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    assuming you’re doing it in a relatively densely populated area that doesn’t normally see earthquakes

    dropping the latter assumption?

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          But that’s usually not true. You can either just not do geothermal in areas that aren’t prone to natural earthquakes, force every homeowner to make their home earthquake-proof (which is extremely expensive, probably a lot more than just building batteries for solar+wind) or suck it up when they get damaged, or the owners of the geothermal plant have to pay for any damages (unlikey).