• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    There’s only 3 major ways to transform different forms of energy into electricity, which are:

    • solar panels (light -> electricity)
    • mechanical engines/generators (mechanical movement -> electricity)
    • electrochemical battery (chemical dipole -> electricity)

    there’s a whole lot more, such as thermoelectric generator and piezoelectricity but these are the three significant ones.

    note that i distinguish these categories by their core essence, such as whether they’re using changes in magnetic flux (like a mechanical generator) or transferring 1 photon on each electron (like solar panels), instead of looking at what source type of energy they transform.

    because there’s many ways to transform e.g. light energy into electricity. you could also heat water with the sunlight and then drive a steam engine with it. but that’s not what i care about. i care about the fundamental connection between different types of energy, and how they can be directly transformed to one another.

  • saarth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    With rising sea levels and general water shortages, why don’t we also use them as desalination plants?

    Surely there has to be a way to deal with brine, it’s just salt and water after all?

    • biggeoff@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Salt is absolutely terrible for any equipment involved in power generation. You’re better off with a power plant and a separate desalination plant than trying to use one for both

      But you’re right, cheap energy will help immensely with this

  • woodenghost [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    In Germany, funding for research is being cut alot. The solar cut happened a long time ago and fifty thousand jobs where lost at the time. Last year, they basically cancelled almost all battery research (needed for electric cars and stuff). Now, many more important stuff is being defunded. Except for fusion. Fusion is receiving a big boost in funding. Everyone and their dog are doing fusion research now

    I think, that’s not despite the famous “fusion constant” (fusion being always “only” thirty years away), but because of it. Unlike solar or batteries or anything else that actually works, fusion does not threaten to disrupt the oligopolies of the power companies, or the car companies or anyone else’s. It enables a wealth transfer (accumulation through dispossession) to companies involved in the research, without contributing to the crisis of overaccumulation, because no use value exists, so no value ever needs to be realized. It’s like building a pyramid in the desert.

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Ofc a new fully renewable insanely powerful source of energy will disrupt the oligopolicies of the power companies. It will disrupt nearly every inch of society.

  • Meron35@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Low key this is a great way to convince people to switch away from fossil fuels.

    Most people seemingly don’t know that coal/gas stations work by essentially boiling water. Most are horrified at how trashy and underdeveloped the concept is compared to high tech alternatives like solar, wind, or hydro.

    • Cliff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      You can transfer gas to electricity without boiling water. But it is much more efficient to combine it with boiling water

    • Geobloke@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well, hydro is just spinning water again, wind is spinning air. Solar is stealing electrons from the sun (i think?) So that’s cool

      • j5906@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Agree, the quantum-chem of it is amazing… Then again, solar has an efficiency of ~30% compared to the 90% for spinning steam

        • crater2150@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t think it makes sense to compare those efficiencies, as one is for converting heat to electricity, while the other is for converting sunlight. If you use sunlight to heat water and then use that for a steam turbine, the efficiency is similar to a photovoltaic panel. The efficiency numbers are still useful, but only when they refer to the same starting point for the conversion (e.g. only comparing things that turn heat into electricity).

        • Geobloke@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          But it’s all profit baby! Let something else figure out cousin, put 0% effort in and collect the rewards!

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They pump water through it. The water gives energy, all our energy is hydrogen baby

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’ve been thinking that for a while. Issue is that it’s risky, if you fuck up there’s a pretty high chance that there are going to be a lot of houses with cracks in their walls (assuming you’re doing it in a relatively densely populated area that doesn’t normally see earthquakes).

            • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              We could just not use any power source that severely damages our environment. Solar and wind don’t have these issues to this extend, even if you include the necessary storage capacity (batteries, hydroelectric reservoirs) and include the resource use for building them (though that resource use is still a pretty big issue).

              Though it’s not impossible to use geothermal energy without severely damaging the environment, you just need either a large amount of unsettled land (like Iceland) or you need to be really, really careful and limit the kinds of things you do - using geothermal energy for district heating apparently is a lot less likely to create earthquakes than what Iceland is doing.

          • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Any powerplant will usually done in a pretty isolated area for safety reason, so i’d assume the chance of it happen is very, very slim. If location isn’t permitted it’s probably shouldn’t be build, especially for the type that need to dig very deep to access the heat, so solar panel on roof is probably the best way for any power generation that is placed close or in the populated area.

            • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Here in Germany, that hasn’t been true at all so far. For starters, there aren’t any “pretty isolated areas” in the first place, since the entire country is pretty densely settled compared to e.g. Iceland. There are still some ongoing projects, though, IIRC they are usually being done for district heating, which has to be near populated areas per definition. I think these types of projects aren’t as likely to create earthquakes as the ones for electricity in Iceland, though.

              • crater2150@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 minutes ago

                I remember seeing a documentary about a village in Germany, where many houses were damaged by geothermal plants, caused by water entering layers where it usually didn’t reach and the material there taking in water and expanding. So it probably depends a lot on the local geology and also on the depth. I sadly don’t remember how deep the one in the documentary was.

                I know a few people that got geothermal heating installed for their homes (in Germany), which goes a lot less deep than something intended for whole cities or districts. The one at my friend’s home is 50m deep, and it looks like anything less than 400m is considered “near surface”

              • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                34 minutes ago

                Huh, interesting. I checked my country for this and it seems here we too have a coal plant right next to housing area, but it seems like the housing is the one creep toward the coal plant, not the other way around.

                But then i’m not sure what sort of error will cause a quake and ruin houses. Is there any case happen to past construction?

          • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            assuming you’re doing it in a relatively densely populated area that doesn’t normally see earthquakes

            dropping the latter assumption?

                • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  But that’s usually not true. You can either just not do geothermal in areas that aren’t prone to natural earthquakes, force every homeowner to make their home earthquake-proof (which is extremely expensive, probably a lot more than just building batteries for solar+wind) or suck it up when they get damaged, or the owners of the geothermal plant have to pay for any damages (unlikey).

        • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Like solar thermal powerplant or molten salt reactor, LAME.

          That’s why solarpunk is the coolest.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s not really a problem, it’s just funny that so many forms of power generation we have are just boiling water to make steam that spins turbines.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Eh, we’re still moving electrons around in wires like Faraday did in the 1800s!

      • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It only feels odd because that is genuinely an incredibly effective means of generation, and we found it very early on because steam is so fundamental. Nothing wrong with sticking to the best method ever discovered.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          and we found it very early on

          just FYI, the electrochemical battery was invented in 1800, while electromechanical generator was invented in around 1866.

      • kossa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Solar concentration is boiling some other liquid, so there’s some variance 😅

    • OshaqHennessey@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Most modern means of electricity production involve creating heat in some way, then using that heat to boil water, creating steam. That steam is then used to turn a turbine, which generates electricity.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Somebody was using the push against magnetic confinement in a pulse reactor to harvest magnetic - > electric directly but it’s been a while since they’ve been in the news.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          that’s why IMHO it’s more important to classify the core coupling mechanism (e.g. photoelectric effect, electromagnetic effect) instead of classifying the total energy in -> energy out types.

        • voracitude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          ·
          11 hours ago

          And some of it is boiling salt!

          Which then boils water, of course.

          But some of it is electrons from photonic impact, no water involved! In the process of energy generation anyway. Statistically and perhaps somewhat ironically, the electrons from that photonic impact may well be used to boil water regardless… Humans just fucking love boiling water.

            • 24_at_the_withers@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I don’t know, but the Ivanpah solar power station near Primm NV, which is a set of three molten salt towers is reportedly getting decommissioned, removed, and replaced with PV panels. Word is PV technology had improved in efficiency and stopped in cost enough that the whole molten salt thing is no longer economically viable, at least in comparison.

            • voracitude@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Oh, absolutely. It’s very cool technology! Molten salt is corrosive as fuck, but that just kinda makes molten salt solar towers even more awesome.

          • fartographer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            They did fix that pretty quickly, but what a classic mad scientist blunder that would turn a well meaning researcher into a villain in any action hero film.

      • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Expect for solar, it’s all just flowy stuff through spinny stuff: wind, water, steam. GRAAAAAAAAAA

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          “Power Plant” won’t be a fitting term until we can generate electricity (at a viable scale) from chloroplasts.

          And wouldn’t that just be solar with extra steps?

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            fun fact: chloroplasts generate an electric potential across the cell membrane during photosynthesis. essentially, they have membrane proteins in their chloroplast membranes that push electrons from one side of the membrane to the other side whenever a photon hits the protein. It’s essentially a natural photovoltaic cell.

            That electric potential is then used to create ATP in nature, while we just directly extract the electrical power through cables.

          • JATth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            40 minutes ago

            You should look at mitochondria:

            • The power plant of the cell.
            • Runs on a proton-gradient.
            • ATP synthase is essentially a molecular turbine and a generator.
            • oh. a turbine. Damm thing spins ~18000 rpm at medium throttle, pumping out elec- ATP. ATP.

            Oops… it’s turbines all the way down.

        • dublet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I dunno if “power plant” quite fits for solar and wind

          Why not?

          The First Law of Thermodynamics: Energy Cannot Be Created or Destroyed

          Fossil fuel power plants merely convert chemical energy into another type.

          • JakenVeina@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Just that “power plant” I think most people associate with large enclosed facilities that house power generating equipment, which doesn’t quite describe wind and solar farms. Hence that most people refer to them as “farms”.

      • Slovene@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’m a steampunk girl

        In a steampunk world

        It’s not a big big thing if you steam me

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I’m going to be this person I guess, but the defining trait of steampunk isn’t the use of steam alone. It’s that energy is transfered by delivering steam to where it’s used, rather than using it in-place to crested electricity. This means that steampunk machines operate off of some kind of kinetic energy, rather than electrical energy.

        Basically, computers (and everything else) are spinning gears, not silicon.

    • mossberg590@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Readily available, low boiling point, non corrosive (relatively), and ecologically safe. What more do you want?

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Molten salt. Lower pressure, higher efficiency, and I believe less reactive in the event of an uh-oh.

        • mossberg590@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          The molten salt is used as the first step. It then makes steam through a heat exchanger. Molten salt is safer next to the actual reactor because water is not a good coolant in case of emergency.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Oh, I was just joking around. What my water system is missing is molten salt.

            Although for the sake of preposterousness, I’m going to suggest we use the molten salt to turn a giant water wheel.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Hydro isn’t. Nor is solar photo voltaic, wind, or tidal, but yeah, nearly everything else is. In a combined-cycle natural gas or diesel plant half of the power generated isn’t steam power, but the other half is.

        • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          13 hours ago

          aah, but it didn’t say steam, it said boiling water.

          smaller gas generators based on internal combustion engines don’t boil water though, right?

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 minutes ago

            gas generators based on internal combustion

            they heat air, afaik. hot gas expands -> mechanical movement moves magnets -> electromagnetism -> electric power.

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            Electromagnetic induction.

            Basically electric motor in reverse…instead of electricity powering the motor, the motor powers electricity.

            But the trick is in “what spins the motor”. In the case if ICE generators, it’s usually a pulley off the crankshaft.

            Or it could be moving water.

      • fullsquare@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        for ccgt it’s more like 2/3 for gas turbine, 1/3 for steam turbine split, even more uneven for diesel/steam because diesel exhaust is much colder

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I mean, you can use a magneto hydrodynamic generator to replace the bits normally spin up by steam.

    But, eh, it’s less efficient than a rankine cycle.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Why don’t we just pipe our water all the way out to the sun and pipe the steam back to earth.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      building a pipe all the way to space would mean the pipe would have to sustain its own weight, which is the same problem as a space elevator. that doesn’t work either because there’s no material on earth strong enough to support its own weight over that distance.

      • Wilco@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I was thinking you could put giant fans on it to blow the clouds away, but then the moon would also knock it down once you got up that high.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          13 hours ago

          What if… hear me out… we pipe straight up into space, and then use a 90° bend to angle the remaining pipe to the sun. Shouldn’t Be too difficult, but I bet those plumbers would charge an expensive ass trip fee.

          ~We’ll need a shit ton of that purple PVC glue though.~

          • Honytawk@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            A couple more 90° bends and you’ll have boiling water in no time. (or one 100° bend)

          • Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            We’ll need a shit ton of that purple PVC glue though.

            Nope, because you can’t use PVC for piping steam. You’re going to need to use metal pipe. Iron pipe is the cheapest bet but it’s such a pain to work with. Personally I’d run copper. I think that’s to code for low pressure steam anyways.

            Wait, if it’s going into space then whos building codes are we using?

            • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              pump ammonia! Can evaporate at PVC compatible temperature.

              A very minor problem with this scheme is the mile thickness insulation needed to not lose much of the sun’s heat to space, on the trip back. A 2nd minor problem is the actual pipe section close to the sun.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m curious if it would even be thermodynamically possible. If we could magically run a pipe that far, would the heat from the water radiate into space before it reached earth to do anything useful?

      Someone get XKCD to do a video short on this.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        i imagine filling any decent sized pipes (! plural because heat exchange has to loop) to 1au would use most of the water on earth.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        What if instead of a pipe to return the steam we use a freaking laser beam!

    • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Oh yeah! I did that for my house. We have free heat and power. It’s a bit of a pain in the ass to build the pipeline that far out and it took me many more hours than expected, but, the system toots along just fine.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Derail Valley Simulator won’t let you drive that exact steam engine, but it simulates Diesel, Steam, and an Electric engine quite satisfactorily. To the point that I can’t use the steam engines without blowing them up accidentally.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        There’s a mod for that!

        But more seriously, watch the water in your sight glass, keep it about 3/4 full at all times and check it like you check your rear view mirror in your car, and don’t forget to open the cylinder cocks every time you stop (or at least when you first start moving) and you should be pretty good to avoid unexpected damage to your locomotive!

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    14 hours ago

    One of the fusion startups says they can use the plasma B field directly. Basically making the plasma the rotor in an electric generator to induce current in a wire.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It seems promising, they’re acting like they’re close. They’ve been promising concrete deliverables, I think they’re supposed to have a working model that can actually capture the energy next year

        You never know, but they’re called Triton if you want to check them out. They don’t share progress often, but when they do it seems pretty candid about their progress

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Please don’t let it be another Theranos, please don’t let it be another Theranos 🙏

        • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I’ve been watching these guys for a while. They have a real shot at getting something on the grid before ITER is even fully operational.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I’m guessing something like most of the magnets contain the plasma, but some transfer energy off it?

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          First, fusion has 0 theoretical economic potential, but there is some potential for energy gains from 2250* + steam. Water deconstructs above this temperature into powerful HHO gas, that when ignited gains another 2500* that will chain react with higher pressure steam to make the steam even hotter/higher pressure. Minor problem of melting all known turbine material, is avoidable through just higher volume of pressured steam.

      • Stowaway@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The one im aware of uses deuterium, aka hydrogen2, to generate helium 3. One of the byproducts being tritium, aka hydrogen3. This means there’s potential for 2 deuteriums to mix with an oxygen molecule,this creating ²H2O, aka heavy water.

        I’m neither a chemist, nor physicist. So someone could probably prove me wrong at the drop of a hat, but Im calling it close enough.:p

        • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 minutes ago

          Yeah, I found what they do here

          So they chose deuterium-helium 3 fusion where there is less neutron radiation. Still they need to breed helium 3 where a lot of energy is lost. Curious to see if they will reflect that in the energy production balance.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          the only things i’ve been seeing from those guys recently are investor pitches…