• someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’m not getting left handed vs right handed. Right handed means negative values go right? Why would anyone do that?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Right handed means that when you curl the fingers on your right hand from +X towards +Y, your thumb points towards +Z.

        • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Someone else was explaining how to tell left from right handed. Buy why is it important? If you do math and physics, you almost certainly would use a right hand system. That means all formulas are derived with that in mind. If you try to use them in the left handed system, you are going to have a horrible time trying to figure out which of all terms need to have their sign flipped.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Eh sort of? It’s all a matter of perspective. In Blender which uses a right hand system, when you view from the side, right is positive Y, up is positive Z, and towards the user is positive X.

          But looking from above, positive X is right, positive Y is up, and positive Z is towards the camera. Obviously if you rotate the camera to be viewing from the negative side of the axis some directions get flipped.

          Basically if you’re axis aligned, things work out the way you would expect.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Tradition, 3d videogames started doing it like that because of how computers worked 40 years ago, then devs got used to think about 3d space that way and it stuck. Essentially videogames think about visual depth. And yes, the physics engines for videogames usually account for that and use their own transformations of formulas because they are rarely simulating anything more complex than rigid body physics. Advanced simulations aren’t any harder for devs, all the transformations are abstracted away with libraries.

          In the end they are just reference frames and up is whatever you want it to be. As Wikipedia puts it eloquently: “Unlike most mathematical concepts, the meaning of a right-handed coordinate system cannot be expressed in terms of any mathematical axioms. Rather, the definition depends on chiral phenomena in the physical world, for example the culturally transmitted meaning of right and left hands, a majority human population with dominant right hand, or certain phenomena involving the weak force.”

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Not really. Youtuber Acerola has a great series on shader programming and dealing with negative numbers is a non-factor. The advantage of working with computers is that it abstracts that complexity away. You program with high level concepts, a dev rarely deals with direct calculations, unless they are actually writing the fundamental apis for it, like DX or Vulkan. Much less copy-paste formulas. It gets complicated fast, but the abstraction keeps it simple for the developer, like, the math is perhaps the easiest part of programming computer graphics.

              • Eldritch@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Ace is a decent watch. Shit post quality video energy, that’s information dense. Always gonna second an Acerola suggestion.

                • dustyData@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 hours ago

                  It’s okay. The equations have been done since a long time ago. Devs don’t have to think about it much. Essentially, computer simulations already have their own body of math that you probably were not taught in physics, because they aren’t relevant for real world physics study.