• WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Its satirizing the tendency for doctors to be more dismissive of women having pain than men, for example. This would be more of a problem with non-visible causes of pain, especially ones that predominantly effect women such as chronic migraines. This comic takes extrapolates this to comedic effect by using a gunshot wound instead.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Not really - if a woman came in with a gunshot wound, she’d be asked if she was pregnant. Why? Because she’d need a CT scan or an X-ray, which are ionizing radiation and have a risk for a foetus. She’d need a scan or x-ray to ensure there was no shrapnel in the would before closure even if superficial, and to assess for damage to vessels or bone etc if deep wound.

      It’s a standard question that any women would recognise from trips to the emergency room. It’s pretty ineffective as a punchline if the cartoonist is trying to make the point you say they’re making.

      Instead it just makes the woman in the cartoon appear dumb/ignorant which totally undermines the message it’s purportedly trying to put across. She is giving a fed up or even patronising look over something that would be essential question in any hospital.

      • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Not really - if a woman came in with a gunshot wound, she’d be asked if she was pregnant. Why? Because she’d need a CT scan or an X-ray, which are ionizing radiation and have a risk for a foetus.

        Pretty sure immediate blood loss from a bullet wound trumps hypothetical risks of an x-ray.

        Edit: To quote the health department of the state next to me…

        Most radiation exposure during medical testing is unlikely to harm a developing baby. Testing is only done if the risk to you or your baby is greater than not doing the test. The ‘risk’ is the increased chance of your unborn baby getting a cancer during their childhood.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I love how a 4 panel comic about dismissal of women’s medical concerns is getting multiple commentors who want to dismiss those problems because a 4 panel comic doesn’t explicitly go into the a specific nuance they are focused on. Plenty of people get the punchline just fine without it.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Nobody is dismissing the problem. They’re saying the comic doesn’t represent the problem. It’s malformed commentary, not wrong commentary.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I don’t even think it’s intended to be about that. I don’t think it’s that deep.

          I think it’s just, “they always ask this question, no matter what.”

      • limelight79@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I thought bandaging the wound would be the first step, stop the bleeding and all that. Not sure how pregnancy would figure into first aid.

        • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I imagine they’d want to give her something for the pain, and potential pregnancy might be a factor? I don’t know, I’m not a doctor, and this is a comic.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            For example, give a pregnant woman Tylenol and boom, autistic baby.

            But seriously, as far as I know, your comment is accurate, a lot of treatment options change when a fetus might be in the situation.

            If a doctor decided to neglect that possibility and harms a fetus no one was aware of, might get hit with malpractice.

            Also I know lab results might depend on either the possibility of pregnancy, or just timing of the period itself.

      • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Sad to say, such nuanced takes don’t belong on lemmy. That shit is like a lemmy repellant.

    • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      But pain meds would be different if you’re pregnant or not.

      I think a lot of people are taking benign questions as straight insults to them.

      Yes do women experience this? Yes. Do men, yes. Is it a valid question for every women that comes across… also yes.

      I guess the period question takes it from what you’re saying, and takes it to a different punch line, and what’s that punch line? I get what you are saying, but comic also clearly has a shift to a different point.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Sure, there are valid medical reasons. This comic isn’t about that. It’s about the outright dismissal of women’s problems. It’s not about changing treatment based on pregnancy status despite the mention of pregnancy - it’s about the ignoring the problem exists at all to be fixed.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          The comic isn’t showing an outright dismissal, though. The doctor hasn’t arrived at a conclusion just by asking a question that seems unrelated.

          Doctors do that kind of digging all the time. It’s not worth it to explain all the interactions and interconnectedness just to get some basic questions answered, so doctors will often just ask weird questions out of the blue.

          • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Of course they do. Still not the point of the comic and plenty of people immediately understood the point. There doesn’t need to be another 4 panels to explain what they’d be.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I think they’re trying to say it doesn’t fully satirize the issue. The doctor isn’t necesarily dismissing anything just by asking the question. They’re saying the joke is malformed, not that the issue cannot exist.