As always, the story Minneapolis residents are sharing is different from what ICE claims.

ICE agents violently restrained a woman in Minneapolis on Monday, dragging her through the snow and pinning her face down as onlookers shouted that the woman was pregnant.

During what was supposed to be a “targeted vehicle stop,” according to ICE officials, protesters swarmed the agents. Esme Murphy, a WCCO reporter, was on the scene, where she saw ICE holding a woman on the ground.

“Please let her go! She’s pregnant!” one onlooker shouted.

“Get her off of her fucking stomach,” another said.

  • Krono@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you’re ever lucky enough to get selected for jury duty on an “assault on a federal officer” case, then I believe it is your civic duty to acquit, no matter the evidence.

    Google “jury nullification”.

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah that era of comedians and pundits had a thing about “frivolous lawsuits”. It’s a conservative talking point, similar to how modern comedians whinge about cancel culture and trans rights.

        I think they were dead wrong, lawsuits protect us all from corporate malfeasance. The grandma that had her genitals melted off by McDonald’s boiling hot coffee deserved even more money, and none of public ridicule.

        That being said, it’s still a great bit.

        • wheezy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Yeah. It’s definitely the part of the bit that didn’t age well so I wanted to give context. You nailed it. I think comedians of that time were leaning into to “libertarianism” since there was no real leftist movement in that time.

          Before we all realized libertarians were all just “age of consent” law pedophiles.

    • Wilco@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It just take 1 person to nullify a jury.

      We can do better and just nullify a grand jury, that way they dont even get charges through.

          • Grand jury is simple majority so one person saying no doesn’t matter, and it’s for indictments only. A failed indictment isn’t an acquittal. They can try again with a different grand jury.

            Petit juries do the trial, you need a uanimous verdict, even a 7/12 or a 11/12 “not guilty” vote is not an aquittal and the charges can be brought again and again forever (unless the judge dismisses it with prejudice).

            • Wilco@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Yes, but there are whole grand Juries in DC doing nullifications. Like the sandwich guy … that’s what I am hoping will happen.