What do people love about Rust? | Rust Blog
blog.rust-lang.org
Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
    • 5C5C5C@programming.dev
      12·
      6 hours ago

      Honestly yes. If I need to manipulate the filesystem or manage processes with any amount of conditional logic or looping, I’d much rather do it with Rust than shell scripts.

      The only thing I use shell scripts for anymore is completely trivial sequences of commands.

        • Ephera@lemmy.mlEnglish
          2·
          5 hours ago

          One of the simplest tricks is that you can throw down a function, which you can call with a command like e.g. this: run("cat /etc/os-release | grep NAME")
          by constructing a Command like so:

          Command::new("sh")
    .arg("-c")
    .arg(command) //the string passed as parameter

          There’s proper libraries to make running commands even easier and more robust, but if you don’t want to pull in a library, that’s really easy to write out ad-hoc and gets you 95% of the way there, with shell piping and everything.

  • Ephera@lemmy.mlEnglish
    1·
    4 hours ago

    “I think proc macros are a really big superpower for Rust.”

    Yeah, been working on a framework and proc-macros are really useful to simplify the API.

    For example, previously I needed users to define a struct and then an impl block with a function inside. Well, and they need to do that a lot, so it was genuinely a bit of a pain to write out, but it also made the code feel more complex than it really was.

    Now I’ve got an annotation, which you can slap onto a function and then it generates the struct from the function parameters and puts the function into the impl block.
    And while you do need to be aware that the function parameters will be put into a struct and therefore you want owned parameters, all-in-all it still feels really nice to just delete dozens of boilerplate lines and an indentation level in the codebases where I’ve introduced it.